Showing : 41-50 of 53 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 14-- Appeal - Non signing by party or defect in authority of person signing appeal or omission to file vakalatnama - Such omission or defect being one relatable to procedure, it can subsequently be corrected...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4(2)-- Explanation (c) - Appeal - Vakalatnama - Appeal filed by same pleader who appeared in the trial court - Fresh vakalatnama need not be filed - In such an event, a mere memo referring to the authority given to him in the trial Court is sufficient...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 1, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 14-- Appeal - Non signing by party or defect in authority of person signing appeal or omission to file vakalatnama - Such omission or defect being one relatable to procedure, it can subsequently be corrected...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Not signed by complainant but signed by counsel - There is no requirement of law that complaint must be signed and presented by the complainant himself - Pleader in whose favour Vakalatnama is executed is duly competent to appear for the complainant in the case..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2004
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 4-- Advocate cannot withdraw his vakalatnama without leave of Court - Practice of Court discharging Advocate on mere filing 'no instruction' deprecated...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2003
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 3, Rule 1-- Counsel possessed of requisite authorization by Vakalatnama can act on behalf of his client and enter into agreement or compromise - Words `in writing and signed by the parties' inserted by the C.P.C. (Amendment) Act, 1976 - Must necessarily mean as provided by Order 3 Rule 1 - Gurpreet Singh's..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2002
Details
Advocate-- Appearance as a witness - Advocate holding vakalatnama and power of attorney - Advocate a family member of the plaintiff - Held, being member of plaintiffs family it can safely be assumed that he must be having personal knowledge about the controversy as such he is a competent witness to testify...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Advocates Act, 1961, Section 35-- Professional misconduct - On basis of signed blank paper and signed blank vakalatnama Advocate fabricated compromise petition - Compromise detrimental to his client - Trial Court insisting for personal appearance of parties - Advocate appealing against trial Court's order - Ultimately securing..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 14-- Plaint - Signing and verification - Bank - Branch Manager - Authorised and empowered by Regulation of State Bank of India General Regulations, 1955 - Suit filed on basis of such Vakalatnama is competent...........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 73-- Signatures - Denial of signatures on rent note and vakalatnama - High Court after comparing signatures on rent note, vakalatnama and admitted signature came to conclusion that all the three signatures are of one and the same person - Plaintiff held to be landlady and entitled to arrears of rent..........

Showing : 41-50 of 53 Results