Showing : 631-640 of 1325 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Insurance-- Theft of vehicle - Delay of 5 months in informing insurance company - Breach of policy - No explanation given by respondent for unusual delay in informing appellant about incident despite of lodging FIR regarding theft of vehicle - In terms of policy issued by appellant, respondent was duty bound..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 157, 166-- Accident - Compensation - Liability fastened on insurance company - Insurance company raised challenge that at the time of accident the vehicle had been sold and the subsequent purchaser had not informed the insurance company as such company is not liable as subsequent purchaser was a stranger and..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149-- Accident - Liability fastened on Insurance Company - Insurance company contended that the driver of the offending vehicle was not possessing valid driving licence at the time of accident - Held, if the insured (owner) himself could not have participated in the fake or forged nature of the licence,..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Insurance claim-- Repudiation - Surveyor after spot survey concluded that as the vehicle was not available on the spot spot survey could not be conducted - The copy of FIR produced by the insured found to be false and fabricated - On analysis of the place of accident it was found that the damage caused to the..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 60, 61, 62-- Recovery of contraband from a jeep - Seizure of jeep - Release of vehicle - No prohibition in the Act for grant of interim custody to the owner during pendency of trial - Trial not likely to be taken up for hearing in the near future - Condition of vehicle likely to deteriorate if kept with the..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)-- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Vehicle purchase - Partnership firm - Merely because vehicle has been purchased by a partnership firm, it cannot be said that the vehicle in question was purchased for any commercial purpose because it was neither intended to be resold with a view to earning any..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 14(1)(d)-- Unfair trade practice - Compensation - Vehicle in question met with an accident in transit and after repairing the damage the vehicle passed on to the complainant as a brand new vehicle by charging the price of a new vehicle - Not only this amounts to defect and deficiency in service on the part..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Vehicle finance-- Forcible repossession - Clear cut finding by the Fora below that the notice was sham and had been issued only after the vehicle had been repossessed - Violation of guidelines issued by the Reserve Bank of India prescribing that a provision regarding final chance to be given to the borrower for..........
NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3-- Additional remedy - Vehicle finance - Forcible repossession - Arbitration - Respondent - complainant had the choice either to go in for arbitration or resort to consumer complaint and the respondent - complainant availed his remedy before the Consumer Fora - District Forum had decided the..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 8(c), 21, 25-- Transportation of 15 Kg. heroine - Prosecution of appellant alongwith three others - Appellant convicted whereas others acquitted - All the accused made confessional statement - Appellant did not retract to his confessional statement - He was the driver of the lorry in which contraband was..........

Showing : 631-640 of 1325 Results