Medical negligence -- Vicarious liability - Non joinder - Non impleadment of operating surgeon - All through the complaint the charges of medical negligence against the operating surgeon whom the complainant chose not to array as party - Do not find any reference to any specific incident in which the OP No.1 - Nursing Home or OP No. 2 Director of the Nursing Home could be..........
Medical negligence -- Vicarious liability - Non joinder - Non impleadment of operating surgeon - All through the complaint the charges of medical negligence against the operating surgeon whom the complainant chose not to array as party - Do not find any reference to any specific incident in which the OP No.1 - Nursing Home or OP No. 2 Director of the Nursing Home could be..........
Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance upon..........
Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance upon..........
Transport service -- Passenger transport - Luggage missing - Vicarious liability - Compensation - Complainant preferred police complaint for missing luggage - Plea that driver on enquiry told the complainant that the cleaner had gone with the luggage - Driver and cleaner not impleaded as party to verify the veracity of the averments in the complaint - Placing reliance..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Company - Cheque issued by a company dishonoured - Who may be prosecuted for offence committed by company - (i) The primary responsibility is on the complainant to make specific averments as are required under the law in the complaint so as to..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Partnership firm - Sufficient averments in complaint as to vicarious liability of partners - A partner whether retired at the relevant time can only be decided after parties lead evidence - Discharge at the threshold u/s 482 Cr.P.C., held, not proper...........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Offence by company - Vicarious liability of Director - Statutory requirements - Held, in absence of any averment in complaint as to how and in what manner petitioner was responsible for conduct of business of company or otherwise responsible to it in regard to its functioning, he cannot be..........
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cognizance - Cheque not signed by petitioner - Signatory of cheque not claiming that his signatures have been forged - Signatory admitting his signatures on cheque and that cheque was given by the firm of which he is the proprietor - Vicarious liability of petitioner not alleged in the complaint - Held,..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 149 -- Vicarious liability - Even the presence in the unlawful assembly, but with an active mind, to achieve the common object makes such a person vicariously liable for the acts of the unlawful assembly...........