Showing : 1-10 of 29 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2019
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311, 284, 285-- Examination of witness - Doctor who conducted first post mortem living in Nigeria - Evidence of this witness germane to the questions involved in the matter - For recording his statement trial Court could have unquestionably taken recourse to the provisions of Ss.284, 285 Cr.P.C. so as to avoid..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012, Section 6, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 118-- Penetrative sexual assault - Child witnesses/victims - Identity of accused was in doubt, as there is no explanation why no identification parade was held - Both victims were counseled but prosecution failed to produce video/CD of counseling and held it back - Defence produced video recording of..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Petitioner is residing in USA - Time gap of 12 hours in two countries - There will be difficulty in approaching Public Authority at night time to allow Video Conferencing - Petitioner allowed to be examined by way of Video Conferencing through..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2018
Details
Marriage-- Two individuals consenting to marry - Dictates of Khap Panchayat/Local community/Family - Guidelines issued : Preventive Steps - (a) State Governments should forthwith identify Districts, Sub-Divisions and/or Villages where instances of honour killing or assembly of Khap Panchayats have been..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 22, 19, 23(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Matrimonial case - Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Once settlement fails and if both parties give consent that witness can be examined in Video Conferencing that can be allowed - (Majority View Per Dipak Mishra, CJ. and A.M.Khanwilkar)...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 22, 19, 23(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Matrimonial case - Recording of evidence through video conferencing - "Footage in Video Conferencing becomes part of the record" is incorrect - Discussions relayed through Video Conferencing in course of settlement will of course not be recorded - Technology answers our commands - (Dissenting View..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Family Courts Act, 1984, Section 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 22, 19, 23(2), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 24, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Matrimonial case - Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Video Conferencing cannot be excluded from any stage of proceeding before Family Court - Whether it should be adopted in a particular case must be left to judicious view of Family Court - High Courts will be well advised to..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 273-- Personal attendance of accused - Recording of evidence by video conferencing - S.273 Cr.P.C. confers a right on accused to be present at the time of recording of evidence - Presence of accused would be necessary to facilitate instructions to be given to his lawyer who is appearing for him in the..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Court proceedings-- Video recording - (i) CCTV cameras (without audio recording) be installed, inside Courts and at such important locations of the Court complexes as may be considered appropriate, in at least two districts of every State/Union Territory; (ii) Monitor thereof may be in the Chamber of District and..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 3, 4-- Recording of evidence through video conferencing - Wherever such facility is available, it ought to be fully utilized and all the High Courts ought to issue appropriate administrative instructions to regulate the use of video conferencing for certain category of cases - Matrimonial cases where one..........

Showing : 1-10 of 29 Results