Showing : 11-20 of 78 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 142(b)-- Dishonour of cheque - Limitation - Condonation of delay - Delay of 25 days in filing complaint - High Court quashed complaint on ground that complaint is barred by limitation when plea of limitation was taken for the first time before High Court - High Court ought to have remanded the matter back..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint u/s 138 of the Act - Time barred - As per evidence on record complaint for two cheques was time barred - Even, when rejection order was challenged before revisional Court, opportunity of hearing was not afforded to petitioner/accused - Moreover, cheques were issued..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2014
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 276, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 137-- Will - Grant of probate - Limitation - Petition has been filed within three years of date of objection raised by respondent No.6, when for the first time the authenticity and validity of Will was challenged - Held, probate petition is not barred by limitation...........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 54-- Specific performance of contract - Limitation - Agreement to sell clearly provides for time within which contract was to be performed - Applicability of Art.54 - Held, limitation period of three years for filing suit for specific performance, thus reckoned from date of expiry of said time - It is..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65-- Adverse possession - First appellate Court has observed that suit is governed by Art. 65 of the Limitation Act under which limitation to file suit for possession of immovable property or interest therein, based on title, is 12 years - However, first appellate Court has ignored portion of Art. 65..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Limitation Act, 1963, Article 65-- Suit for possession - Suit filed in the year 1996 - Plea of adverse possession - Limitation to file suit for possession based on title is 12 years - Time from which the said period begins to run is when the possession of defendant became adverse to the plaintiff - Proof of mere possession from..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Article , Order , Rule , Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Article , Order , Rule -- Execution - Delivery of property - Application for - Delay in filing - Condonation - Application filed for delivery of property U.O.21.R.95 CPC - Said application dismissed for not taking appropriate step as ordered by execution Court - Subsequent application moved for delivery beyond period of..........
NATIONAL DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 3, Limitation Act, 1963, Article 54, Contract Act, 1872, Section 23, 24, 28-- Additional remedy - Complicated questions of facts and law - Plot allotment - Sale Deed - Execution of - Specific performance - Limitation - Original contract made between deceased 'S' and deceased -'M-' sometime in 1969 - Assuming that no date was fixed for the performance of contract between the..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of pleadings - Claim barred by limitation - Factors to be taken into account - Held, normally a plaintiff cannot be permitted to amend plaint by adding a fresh claim or relief if on the date when application for amendment is moved that claim or relief is barred by law of limitation -..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, 12-- Rejection of plaint - Court at the time of assuming jurisdiction can reject plaint for curable defects when not rectified or due to non curable defects - O.7.R.11(b), (c), (e), and (f) are curable defects - O.7.R.11(a) and (d) are defects when plaint does not disclose cause of action or suit is..........

Showing : 11-20 of 78 Results