Showing : 91-100 of 264 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - A Will is required to be attested by two witnesses but it can be proved by examining one of the attesting witnesses - However, one of the requirements of due execution of a Will is its attestation by two or more witnesses, which is mandatory - Aid of S.71 Evidence Act can be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Signing by testator in the presence of attesting witnesses and signing by attesting witnesses in the presence of testator - One of the attesting witnesses examined who proved his signature and stated in cross examination that the other witnesses, testator, himself and one other..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Attesting witness - Will proved by examining one attesting witness - Attesting witness examined alleged to be not the one who had attested the Will - In cross examination there is no discussion or even a suggestion that attesting witness examined is not the one who had attested..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Execution of - Proof - DW1 categorically deposed that Will was executed by testator in his presence and also in presence of another attesting witness - Both of them have subscribed their signatures after witnessing execution by testator who also witnessed their attestation - Held, Will has..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Settled position of law is that a Will is mandatorily required to be attested by two witnesses in terms of S.63 (c) of Succession Act, 1925 - Requirement of S.68 of Evidence Act has also to be complied with for proof of Will which lays down mode of proof - It envisages that it..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Pendency of criminal case against attesting witnesses and plaintiff - Not a ground to reject the material evidence adduced in Civil Court to establish the execution of Will - In fact, criminal prosecution was stayed sine die facilitating the termination of the civil case filed..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Testator executed the Will and the witnesses attested the same at the same sitting - Sufficient compliance with the provision of S.63 Succession Act to prove the Will - Narration of sequence leads to no other inference but the one that testator executed the document in his..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Will is required to be attested by two witnesses - However, due execution can be proved by producing only one attesting witness...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Execution of agreement proved - No proof that execution of agreement was in lieu of security of loan - Recital in agreement and evidence that there was intention to deliver possession - Subsequent purchaser deemed to be in knowledge of agreement as he resident of the same..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Suspicious circumstances - Two version available as to where document was scribed - No unanimity on time when document was written - Not established in unequivocal terms that contents of Will were read over and explained to the testatrix and it is after understanding the same to be..........

Showing : 91-100 of 264 Results