Showing : 91-100 of 262 Results

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Attesting witness - Will proved by examining one attesting witness - Attesting witness examined alleged to be not the one who had attested the Will - In cross examination there is no discussion or even a suggestion that attesting witness examined is not the one who had attested..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Succession Act, 1925, Section 63, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 68-- Will - Execution of - Proof - DW1 categorically deposed that Will was executed by testator in his presence and also in presence of another attesting witness - Both of them have subscribed their signatures after witnessing execution by testator who also witnessed their attestation - Held, Will has..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Settled position of law is that a Will is mandatorily required to be attested by two witnesses in terms of S.63 (c) of Succession Act, 1925 - Requirement of S.68 of Evidence Act has also to be complied with for proof of Will which lays down mode of proof - It envisages that it..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2013
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Pendency of criminal case against attesting witnesses and plaintiff - Not a ground to reject the material evidence adduced in Civil Court to establish the execution of Will - In fact, criminal prosecution was stayed sine die facilitating the termination of the civil case filed..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Testator executed the Will and the witnesses attested the same at the same sitting - Sufficient compliance with the provision of S.63 Succession Act to prove the Will - Narration of sequence leads to no other inference but the one that testator executed the document in his..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Will is required to be attested by two witnesses - However, due execution can be proved by producing only one attesting witness...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Execution of agreement proved - No proof that execution of agreement was in lieu of security of loan - Recital in agreement and evidence that there was intention to deliver possession - Subsequent purchaser deemed to be in knowledge of agreement as he resident of the same..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Suspicious circumstances - Two version available as to where document was scribed - No unanimity on time when document was written - Not established in unequivocal terms that contents of Will were read over and explained to the testatrix and it is after understanding the same to be..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Execution of Will never disputed by defendant - Plea of defendant that Will was revoked by testator vide subsequent Will - Held, execution of Will stands admitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Will -- Execution - Proof - Scribe of Will examined but in cross examination he stated that he does not know the executant and the witnesses of Will personally - No attesting witness of the Will examined to prove the Will - Testimony of scribe is not sufficient to prove execution of Will as he does not..........

Showing : 91-100 of 262 Results