Showing : 111-120 of 262 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Placement of signatures of testator on the document - Signature of the testator appearing at the right hand bottom part of the Will - Placement of signature clearly suggest that document was intended to be given effect as a Will...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Deposition of attesting witnesses that testator had executed a Will in favour of appellant and signed the same in their presence - Signatures of testator appearing at the right hand bottom part of the Will which is appropriate and suggestive of the fact that document was..........
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Will 30 years old - Presumption as to its correctness u/s 90 of the Evidence Act applies if it comes from proper custody and demonstrate that it is otherwise free from suspicion. (Evidence Act, 1872, S.90)...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Only one attesting witness examined - No explanation furnished for non examination of second attesting witness - Held, will not proved...........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - One attesting witness can prove execution of Will provided he speaks about attestation by the other attesting witness also - If he does not speak about attestation by other attesting witness then it is incumbent upon propounder to examine the other attesting witness also - If..........
KERALA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - One attesting witness examined to prove the Will who deposed that other witness also signed the document though not in the presence of testator - Held, it by implication and inference shows the attestation by the other witness also...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Neither attesting witnesses nor scribe produced on the ground that all were dead - Held, in such a case Will is required to be proved in accordance with S. 69 of the Evidence Act which they failed to do - Contention that will being more than 30 years old could be presumed to..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - Will 30 years old - Held, presumption u/s 90 of Evidence Act is not applicable in the case of a Will which has to be proved in accordance with S.68 or S.69 of Evidence Act...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - One attesting witness examined - Could not proved the will as his vision was poor - Other attesting witness not examined - No evidence on record that the other attesting witness is dead - Held, as it is imperative to examine at least one attesting witness of the Will to prove..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution - Proof - One attesting witness examined and he only admitted his signatures on the Will - In cross examination he admitted that he never visited the place where Will was executed - Scribe did not produce any scribe register to prove the presence of the witnesses or the executant at the..........

Showing : 111-120 of 262 Results