Showing : 91-100 of 178 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13-- Ex parte decree - Setting aside - Limitation - Knowledge of ex parte decree - Petitioner himself not stepping into the witness box and not stating as to when passing of ex parte decree came to his knowledge - Held, statement of petitioner's attorney as witness cannot fill the gap - It was only..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27-- Suit for specific performance - Additional evidence - No explanation why certified copy of alleged agreement was not produced by plaintiff at appropriate stage of his evidence - Said agreement was well within knowledge of present plaintiff while plaintiff was leading his evidence - Held, only..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 65, 66-- Adverse possession - Plea of - Tenability - According to defendant No.1, he is not in possession of disputed property - He has sublet the property to defendant Nos.2 and 3 - Defendant Nos.2 and 3 have never contested the suit - They have not appeared in witness box to support case of defendant..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Summons for production of documents - SP Vigilance conducting investigation - Summons for production of documents issued by ASI - It is SP Vigilance who is competent to issue summons for production of documents - If he had authorized ASI complainant to issue summons on his behalf, then he could..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Proof - Impugned cheque signed by applicant - Cheque was returned dishonoured on the ground of non sufficiency of funds - Demand notice issued by respondent neither replied by nor the amount of such cheque was paid by him - In defence-statement applicant-accused stated that..........
ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 313, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 57, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 20-- Sample sent for analysis 10 grams - FSL found it to be 20 grams - It was for the person who had drawn the sample to have entered into the witness box and explain how much sample he had drawn and how there was discrepancy in its quantity - Held, sample which was drawn was tampered with and no..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 2-- Power of attorney - Statements of power of attorney on both sides could be read in evidence as the facts relating to sale transaction having taken place in front of them were in their personal knowledge and, therefore, no, appearance of plaintiff and defendant themselves in the witness box could..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Conduct of defendant in putting forth different theories in written statement and in the witness box - Defence raised rejected...........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949, Section 13-- Bonafide requirement - Landlady respondent No.2 gifted her 1/2 share in demised premises of her husband respondent No.1 where tenant was in occupation of ground floor - Respondent No.1 wanted to start his chartered accountant business in ground floor as it was not permissible on 1st floor as per..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Defendant/vendor not stepping into the witness box and evidence was given only by her husband - Whether insufficient? - Held, No - It is for the plaintiff who approaches Court to prove that he was ready and willing to perform the contact...........

Showing : 91-100 of 178 Results