Showing : 51-60 of 104 Results

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 3, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 91, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 12, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 340-- Summons for production of documents - SP Vigilance conducting investigation - Summons for production of documents issued by ASI - It is SP Vigilance who is competent to issue summons for production of documents - If he had authorized ASI complainant to issue summons on his behalf, then he could..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138-- Dishonour of cheque - Proof - Impugned cheque signed by applicant - Cheque was returned dishonoured on the ground of non sufficiency of funds - Demand notice issued by respondent neither replied by nor the amount of such cheque was paid by him - In defence-statement applicant-accused stated that..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 3, Rule 1, 2-- Power of attorney - Statements of power of attorney on both sides could be read in evidence as the facts relating to sale transaction having taken place in front of them were in their personal knowledge and, therefore, no, appearance of plaintiff and defendant themselves in the witness box could..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2011
Details
Agreement to sell-- Suit for specific performance - Defendant/vendor not stepping into the witness box and evidence was given only by her husband - Whether insufficient? - Held, No - It is for the plaintiff who approaches Court to prove that he was ready and willing to perform the contact...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Will-- Execution of will - Statement of one of the attesting witnesses of the will, recorded in previous suit tendered into evidence - Scribe and Sub Registrar while appearing in the witness box stated that testator had signed/thumb marked the will in their presence and in the presence of other witnesses..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Party to the suit not entering into witness box - Attorney examined as a witness - Factum within personal knowledge of defendant himself - It was imperative for defendant to have himself stepped into witness box - Held, on account of non examination of a party as his own witness, very strong..........
DELHI HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 5-- Restitution of conjugal rights - Petition filed by husband - Wife denied even factum of marriage, but did not even bother to step into the witness box - Husband produced photographs showing essential ceremonies being performed - Petition allowed - Held, where the fact of celebration of marriage is..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Defendant not entering the witness box - No explanation whatsoever - Adverse presumption has to be drawn against the defendant...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 34-- Attempt to murder - Common intention - Evidence that both the accused went to their house and fetched gun and main accused fired at the complainant - Neither any overt act warranting inference of common intention attributed to co-accused nor complainant stated anything about that while gaining..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Party to the suit not entering into the witness box - Adverse inference can be drawn against that party...........

Showing : 51-60 of 104 Results