Showing : 91-99 of 99 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - It is the Court and not the party who can recall a witness and to put any question which the Court thinks necessary - Party cannot recall a witness who has already been cross-examined for further cross-examination...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 45-- Expert's report - Report of expert does not go in evidence automatically - He has to be examined as a witness in Court and has to face cross-examination...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1999
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Party not entering into the witness box to state his own case on oath and not offering himself to be cross examined by the other side - A presumption would arise that the case set up by him is not correct...........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17A-- Re - calling of witness for further cross - examination as witness could not be effectively cross - examined earlier - There has to be something more that mere wish of defendant to further cross - examine the witness of the plaintiff - Once witness has been cross - examined, he cannot be recalled..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of witness for further cross examination - Once witness is cross-examined, he cannot be recalled for further cross-examination on the ground that he was not cross-examined effectively...........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Murder - Gun shot - Evidence of eye witness and doctor who examined first same that victim was fired from the back - Doctor who performed post mortem differed and deposing that wound was on chest and exit wound on the back - Accused backing upon inconsistency between ocular evidence and post..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1998
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17, 17-A-- Application of defendant for summoning petition writer for further cross examination - Application filed U.O.18.R.17 CPC - Allowed - Contention that witness could not be cross-examined even if application allowed - Held, contents of application clearly show that application in fact was under..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 1997
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 34-- Appellants A1 to A4 assaulted deceased with knives - PWs 1, 2, 3 & 8 were examined as eye-witnesses - Trial Court acquitted all accused - High Court reversed the order of acquittal - Appeal - PW.1 and PW.2 did not fully support the prosecution case as they did not name or identify appellants as..........
MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 1995
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 138-- Re-examination of a witness - Since the witness is examined by the trial Court as such trial Court is in the best position to Judge whether there was an ambiguity apparent in the evidence in view of averments made by the rival parties in the suit - That assessment has to be done by the trial Court..........

Showing : 91-99 of 99 Results