Showing : 11-20 of 108 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 17, Rule 2, 3-- Closure of plaintiffs evidence - Six effective opportunities for concluding evidence were availed by plaintiff but evidence not concluded - Case was adjourned for evidence of defendant - However, taking into account that plaintiff is to be cross-examined and is to lead evidence through one more..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness for further cross examination - A witness cannot be recalled for further cross examination for elaboration on the points left out in the cross examination, when points on which witness is to be further cross examined are not mentioned...........
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of a witness - Provision does not limit discretion of Court or creates any barrier in exercising such discretion - However, Court should come to conclusion that allowing of party to examine a witness or cross-examine a witness already examined, should be bonafide and it is based on..........
PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recalling of witness - Previously Legal Aid counsel was engaged and subsequently accused engaged another counsel - Previous counsel was given due opportunity to cross-examine witness and had duly cross-examined - No finding can be recorded that such legal aid counsel appointed by District Legal..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114-- Presumption - Where a party to a suit fails to enter into a witness box to state his/her own case on oath and does not offer himself/herself to be cross-examined by other side, presumption would arise that case set up by him/her is not correct...........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 279, 337, 338, Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 181-- Rash and negligent driving - Collusion of bus and jeep - Injuries caused to passengers of bus - Author of site plan not examined - Prosecution witness in cross examination stating that for exculpating guilt of complainant, `false case' foisted upon accused - Failure of prosecution to prove guilt..........
TELANGANA AND ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17-- Recall of a witness - Recall of one defendant by another defendant - Both of them are on the same side, without any conflicting interest against each other - Such defendant was protecting his own right and was cross-examined by plaintiff, did not come up with any application for reopen and recall..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 311-- Recall of PWs for cross-examination - Statements of I.O was recorded but inadvertency he was not cross-examined with relation to Article-1 which was exhibited by him - Immediately, thereafter, petitioner moved an application u/s 311 Cr.P.C. seeking recalling of witnesses to the extent of Article..........
MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Will-- Execution - One of the attesting witness examined and subjected to cross-examination - Mere no, examination of other attesting witness, who happens to be scribe also, would not render duly executed Will not genuine document...........
ORISSA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2017
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 409-- Criminal breach of trust - Misappropriation of money - Allegations that petitioner received amount from customer to deposit in account but there is no direct evidence to that effect - Customer could not be examined during trial on account of his death - None of his family members who were..........

Showing : 11-20 of 108 Results