Showing : 1-6 of 6 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2012
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 4-- Promissory note - Execution - Proof - Initial burden discharged by promisee - Burden shifted to maker to prove that promissory note was not supported by valid consideration - Maker miserably failed to send reply to demand notice of plaintiff-promisee - Maker having denied his won documents and his..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2010
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100-- Second Appeal - New plea - Money suit on the basis of pronote and receipt - Suit decreed - Appellant taking plea that pronote and receipt are not sufficiently stamped - This plea neither pleaded in written statement nor raised before trial court - Held, appellant is estopped from raising this plea..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2008
Details
Punjab Regulations of Accounts Act, 1930, Section 3(1)(a)(b)-- Suit for recovery on basis of pronote decreed - Appeal filed by defendant met the fate of dismissal - Defendant contended that plaintiff has not complied with provisions of Ss.3 & 4 of Act of 1930 as he failed to furnish copy of statement of his account - Neither any such plea was raised by..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2006
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Amendment of written statement - Contradictory plea - Written statement with plea that pronote & receipt forged & fabricated document - Amendment sought to plead that blank signed pronote & receipt available with commission agent used for purpose of suit - Amendment contradictory to plea raised in..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Written statement - Amendment - Execution or pronote and receipt denied and that defendant never received any consideration - Amendment sought to plead that defendant did execute pronote and receipt but without consideration - Amendment if allowed would displace the plaintiff's line of action and..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2000
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 37, Rule 5-- Leave to defend - Defendant is entitled to unconditional leave to defend if a triable issue is raised indicating bona fide defence - Truth or otherwise of the issue is not at all relevant consideration in granting such leave - Defendant taking a specific plea in written statement denying execution..........

Showing : 1-6 of 6 Results