Showing : 3941-3950 of 6991 Results

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Legal Services Authorities Act, 1987, Section 20, 21, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 1-- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint transferred to Lok Adalat - Compromise by parties - Award of Rs.4 lacs passed - Such an award is a decree and same is executable under CPC - Execution - Pecuniary jurisdiction of Court restricted to Rs.1 lac - Held, execution petition is not liable to be dismissed..........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17-- Written statement - Amendment - Sought at the stage when case was fixed for rebuttal evidence - Amendment sought in no manner alters or substitutes the stand already taken by defendants - Amendment sought only an elaboration of the defence already set out - An application for amendment cannot be..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 23-- Land acquisition - Compensation - Market value - Depends upon a large number of factors - The first is nature and quality of land whether agricultural land or homestead land - If it is agricultural land then other factors relevant are also required to be considered viz. as to whether it is..........
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 304-- Part I - Nature of offence - One arrow shot - Offence is covered by S.304 Part I IPC and not S.302 IPC - Though it cannot be laid down that whenever one arrow is shot S.302 IPC will not apply - However, on the facts of the present case it appears to be so - Conviction altered from S.302 to S.304..........
PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Land Acquisition Act, 1894, Section 4, 6, 48-- Land acquisition - Some of land owners challenged notification issued u/s 4 of the Act and declaration issued u/s 6 of the Act by filing writ petitions and same allowed - Held, order will operate for all land owners including those who had not raised any challenge against acquisition - However,..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 34, 325-- Common intention - Proof of - All accused were present at the spot when incident took place - In that spur of moment, no body may have visualized that some beatings with shoe will be given by accused "P", who started giving blows on person of victim with plastic shoe which she was wearing in her..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 376, 366A, 363-- Rape case - Prosecution allegation that prosecutrix when came out of house at night time to urinate, accused over powered her and took her to number of places and raped her - Prosecutrix 20 years of age at the time of incident as per births and deaths register which is authentic proof of age -..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 279, 337, 338-- Rash and negligent driving - Culpable negligence lies in the failure to exercise reasonable and proper care and the extent of its reasonableness will always depend upon the circumstances of each case - 'Rashness' consists in hazarding a dangerous or wanton act with the knowledge that it is so, and..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 157-- India Motor Tariff, GR 17 - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Ground that respondent had no insurable interest as intimation of transfer in accordance with Section 157 MV Act and GR 17 not given either by the registered owner or by the transferee - Admittedly it was the respondent who had paid the..........
HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA
Year of decision: 2009
Details
Insurance claim-- Non settlement - Compensation - Interest on compensation - For two years the matter remained under correspondence and the appellant successfully evaded the settlement of the claim without any justifiable cause as well as in the face of the opinion of the Surveyor - Award of compensation of Rs...........

Showing : 3941-3950 of 6991 Results