Showing : 41-50 of 137 Results

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16(a)(a),, 14, 19-- Joint trial of vendor, distributor and manufacturer - Not illegal - If there is unity of purpose between the manufacturer, distributor and vendor all of them come within the meaning of seller u/s 19(2) of the Act - Neither S.7 nor S.14 of the Act bars trial of joint offences by the same accused,..........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 32(g)(i)-- 'Best use before six months' from date of packing - Does not mean that shelf life is six months - 'Best before' means that it is to be used before six months for its specific qualities...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7(1), 16(c)(a)(i), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 53, 54, 55-- Sample of sweetened carbonated beverages (Coca Cola, Limca etc.) - They have no shelf life - No preservative is required to be added in the sample...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Sample - Found adulterated by Public Analyst - Accused has remedy to get second sample analysed by Central Food Laboratory - If accused does not avail the remedy then it cannot be held that accused suffered prejudice on account of delay in laying the prosecution...........
ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Sample of sweetened carbonated beverages (Coca Cola etc.) - Prosecution launched after 23 months of taking sample - Request for sending second sample by Central Food Laboratory not availed on the ground that shelf life of carbonated water which was six months had already expired before launching..........
GUJARAT HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 13(2)-- Public analyst report - Non sending of - Notice sent - No proof as to sending of report of Public Analyst to accused - Violation of mandatory provision of S.13(2) - Accused acquitted...........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Reduction in sentence - Conviction - Accused 79 years old - No useful purpose would be served in sending accused in prison at this stage - Sword of conviction hanging over the head of accused for the last 19 years - This by itself is sufficient punishment - Sentence reduced to the extent already..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i)-- Milk - Deviation in milk fat by 0.15% - Report of Director, Central Food Laboratory that it falls within the experimental tolerance and other parameters being well within the specified limits, the same may be deemed to conform to the standard laid down for cow's milk under the PFA Act and Rules..........
PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(i)-- Reduction in sentence - Conviction - Accused faced trial for 20 years - Sentence reduced to already undergone...........
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Year of decision: 2005
Details
Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 7, 16, 20-- Second analysis of sample on request of accused - First report gets superseded - It is only the later report which is considered to be final while examining the cases of food adulteration...........

Showing : 41-50 of 137 Results