LawMirror.com

Results of dismissed for default restoration

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 91-100 of 267 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 256 -- Dishonour of cheque - Restoration of complaint dismissed in default - Single absence - Case transferred from place `M' to place `J' and again re-transferred from place `J' to place `M' - Magistrate instead of dismissing complaint in default should have adjourned the case at least..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Application for restoration filed after delay of 18 months - Appellant was aware about dismissal of suit still he knowingly failed to file application for restoration within prescribed period - Application rightly rejected...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay of 513 days - Plea of illness and non intimation of dismissal by counsel - Said plea not substantiated by plaintiff - Even delay of 513 days in approaching Court not explained by plaintiff - Application for restoration of suit..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 8, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(c) -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Defendant duly represented and it was plaintiff who did not appear - Order of dismissal of suit is U.O.9.R.8 CPC - Rejection of application for restoration of suit is covered U.O.43.R.1(c) CPC - Factual mistake committed by lower..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 141, Order 9, Rule 9 -- Restoration of restoration application dismissed in default - Application U.O.9.R.9 CPC seeking restoration of restoration application dismissed in default is maintainable - Plea regarding no, maintainability of application thus, has no substance...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Dismissal of complaint in default - Restoration - Complaint dismissed for want of prosecution only for single default - Justice demands its restoration and decision on merit - Impugned order set aside - Complaint restored...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 457 -- Application u/s 457 Cr.P.C - Dismissed in default - Restoration application - Maintainability - Application for restoration of earlier application by recalling order by Magistrate is not permissible under law - However, petitioner is not remediless, he has two remedies firstly to approach High Court or Session Court and..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Delay of 1085 days - Suit for permanent injunction and mandatory injunction - Petition was returned for some rectification - But due to bundle was misplaced in Advocate`s office there was a delay of 1085 days occurred in..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Restoration of restoration application dismissed in default - Decree holder should not have contested the application and could have given statement for restoration of the same subject to any terms and conditions - Application filed U.O.9.R.13 CPC ordered to be restored and two effective opportunities afforded to conclude..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2017
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 3, 4 -- Restoration of suit - Suit dismissed in default U.O.9.R.3 - Both parties absent - No notice had been sent to counsel or parties with respect to change of date - Case of plaintiffs is that they wrongly noted date and then moved an application for restoration within 1 month of date they had noted - No objection given to..........

Showing : 91-100 of 267 Results