LawMirror.com

Results of %27

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1031-1040 of 1542 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence at second appellate stage - Permission may be granted to produce documents if these are likely to widely affect the decision of the Court in one way or the other...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence at appellate stage - Appellate court has the power to allow additional evidence not only if it requires such evidence `to enable it to pronounce judgment' but also for `any other substantial cause'...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence at appellate stage - Circumstances under which additional evidence can be adduced are : (i) the court from whose decree the appeal is preferred has refused to admit evidence which ought to have been admitted; (ii) the party seeking to produce additional evidence, establishes that notwithstanding the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 27 -- Additional evidence at appellate stage - High Court decided appeal without deciding application for additional evidence - Order of High Court set aside and matter remanded for decision afresh...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138(b), General Clauses Act, 1897, Section 27, Evidence Act, 1872, Section 114 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Presumption as to - Notice was sent on correct address of respondent - It was also within time as per provision u/s 138 Proviso(b) and appellant in his statement has specifically stated that respondent got returned..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Evidence Act, 1872, Section 27 -- Disclosure statement - Weapon of offence and cash recovered on basis of disclosure statement made by accused - Disclosure statement and recovery memos not signed by accused - Held, these documents carry no evidentiary value in the eye of law...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(9)(b)(c), 27(b)(ii) -- Appellants were manufacturer of Ayurvedic medicines - Ozomen capsules which has a component of sildenafil citrate which is an allopathic drug and it cannot be used by anybody else unless a person who holds licence for it - Appellant had no licence - Liable for offences u/s 18(a)(b)(c) punishable u/s 27(b)(ii)..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Section 18(9)(b)(c), 27(b)(ii) -- Appellants were manufacturer of Ayurvedic medicines - Ozomen capsules which has a component of sildenafil citrate which is an allopathic drug and it cannot be used by anybody else unless a person who holds licence for it - Appellant had no licence - Liable for offences u/s 18(a)(b)(c) punishable u/s 27(b)(ii)..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT(DB)

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 25 , 27 , 27A -- Writ jurisdiction - Alternative remedy - Order under Section 27 passed by the Forum - No appeal filed under Section 27A of the Act - Writ petition filed before High Court - Held that there was no occasion for the petitioner to come up in writ petition before High Court when..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226, Central Motor Vehicles Rules, 1989, Rule 27 -- Cancellation of Driving Training School License of petitioner - Challenge as to - Petitioner involved in issuance of fake driving license to 4 persons - Such act of petitioner being prohibited by terms and conditions laid down at time when license for establishment of driving school..........

Showing : 1031-1040 of 1542 Results