LawMirror.com

Results of o 21

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1691-1700 of 3698 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 50, 21 -- Provision of S.50 of the Act is mandatory - Non compliance with the mandatory provision - Accused is entitled to acquittal - Accused cannot be convicted on the basis of proof of prosecution case when there is non compliance with the mandatory provision of S.50 of the Act...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Non disclosure about previous policies - Policies were issued within 2 years period before the death of the life assured - There are no allegations of preexisting ailment or any complaints about health of the life assured or any..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 46, Contract Act, 1872, Section 128, 141 -- Execution of decree passed against legal heirs of deceased borrower who have inherited his property - Decree passed jointly and severally - D.H. is entitled to recover the decretal amount from any one of the defendants - If there is any dispute inter se the..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Non disclosure about previous policies - Policies were issued within 2 years period before the death of the life assured - There are no allegations of pre - existing ailment or any complaints about health of the life assured or..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi - claim policy - Pre - existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 6.8.1997 to 5.8.1998 - As per record, Coronary artery..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Housing - Flat allotment - Non handing of possession - Compensation - Punitive costs - In one complaint purchaser of flat has paid the entire consideration and in other substantial amount paid and willing to pay the balance amount - Builder cannot deprive them..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi - claim policy - Pre - existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 6.8.1997 to 5.8.1998 - As per record, Coronary artery..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Housing - Flat allotment - Non handing of possession - Compensation - Punitive costs - In one complaint purchaser of flat has paid the entire consideration and in other substantial amount paid and willing to pay the balance amount - Builder cannot deprive them..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi-claim policy - Pre-existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 06.08.1997 to 05.08.1998 - As per record, Coronary artery..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Housing - Flat allotment - Non handing of possession - Compensation - Punitive costs - In one complaint purchaser of flat has paid the entire consideration and in other substantial amount paid and willing to pay the balance amount - Builder cannot deprive them..........

Showing : 1691-1700 of 3698 Results