Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),(ii) -- Consumer - Complainant appointed as a dealer by second respondent on commission/ discount benefit basis - Complainant was rendering service - Law demands 'hiring-of-services' - It was second respondent who had 'hired-the-services' of the complainant - Under no circumstances, the complainant could be said to be a..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),2(1),(m) -- Complaint - Maintainability of - Trust - Equitable relief Trust is not included in the definition of the word 'person' - Trust is not legal entity - Cannot be considered to be 'person' which can file a complaint under the Consumer Protection Act - Moreover complaint was filed by Trust without making all the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Deficiency in service - Compensation - Mobile connection - Credit limit - Respondents-OP did not show credit limit to the appellant - It was incumbent upon them to make clear to the appellant that such and such is the amount in credit limit and if he crossed that credit limit by usage, then mobile connection..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Appeal - Limitation - Condonation of delay - It is not stated in the application as to why there is delay of 52 days in filing appeal - Delay not explained with reasonable certainty - Appeal held time barred and liable to be dismissed in limine...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g) -- Haryana Urban Development (Disposal of Land and Buildings) Regulation, 1978, Regulation 5(5) - Housing - Plot allotment - Deemed cancellation of allotment - Respondent required to deposit 15% of the total sale price as demanded in clause 5 of the allotment within 30 days which it failed - Plea that he could not deposit the..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Plot allotment - As per condition in allotment letter dated 1.2.2001 complainant was required to make the deposit of the requisite amount within 30 days of the receipt of the allotment letter which he failed - Representation filed on 14.1.2002 before OPs - Complaint instituted on 2.9.2005 - District Forum was duty..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13(1),(c) -- Soft drink - Allegedly contaminated - District Forum did not follow the detailed procedure as prescribed in Section 13(1) (c) and the Haryana Consumer Rule - Findings recorded on the basis of observation with regard to the contents of the bottle which were visible to the naked eyes when the bottle produced after more than..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Telegraph Act, Section 7 - B - Telephone bill - Excessive bill - Not complained of any misuse of the line - It is found in the investigation that no fault was found either in the meter or other metering equipments - Such dispute does not fall within the purview of Section 7B of the Act and therefore the Forum ought not to..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 25 -- Execution proceedings - In execution proceedings the District Forum cannot go behind the order - What was ordered either the original plot be allotted or in case it is not available then an alternative plot - The order affirmed upto the Hon'ble Supreme Court - The order complied with after allotting an alternative plot - Plea..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 25 -- Execution proceedings - District Forum cannot go behind the order - What the District Forum had ordered was either the original plot be allotted or in case it is not available then an alternative plot which have been done - Findings of both the Fora below that order/decree has been complied with - In these circumstances no..........
