LawMirror.com

Results of dismissed for default restoration

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 11-20 of 267 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Suit land is joint and defendant was trying to usurp best portion of same without getting it partitioned as per plaintiff - However, defendant has raised a specific plea that suit land stood partitioned and partition had been implemented - Appeal filed against order of partition was dismissed in..........

JHARKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 9, Rule 4, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Suit dismissed at the initial stage on the ground that Court fee was not deposited - Sufficient ground is made out for condonation of delay - Suit was not admitted as yet - There is thus, no need for issuing notice..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 13 -- Restoration of restoration application dismissed in default - Present restoration application has been filed by petitioner after a lapse of more than 3 years - Trial Court rightly dismissed the application...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9, Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Condonation of delay - Partition suit - Plaintiff and defendant are siblings and delay is only 92 days - One opportunity be given to plaintiff in the interest of justice to put forth her case on imposition of terms and cost - Suit restored subject to..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Clean hands -- Restoration of petition dismissed in default - Petitioner must approach Court with clean hands - It is not acceptable when false averments are made in the affidavit filed in support of application besides statements of irrelevant and non existing facts...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 105(2), Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5 -- Execution petition - Dismissed in default - Restoration - Applicability of S.5 of limitation Act - S.5 of Limitation Act is not applicable to any of provision U.O.21 CPC, in view of phrase `other than application under any of provision of O.21 CPC' used in S.5 of Limitation Act -..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 41, Rule 19 -- Restoration of appeal dismissed in default - Petitioner who was looking after the case was not completely bedridden during the relevant period - No evidence on record that petitioner was not in a position to instruct her advocate to pursue the matter - Except bald allegation against counsel, there is no material available on..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 9 -- Restoration of suit dismissed in default - Partition suit - In a suit for partition, each party is plaintiff and even if plaintiff is not proceeding with the suit, Court was required to proceed with the suit - Suit dismissed in the year 2016 having no legal or rational reason - Time passed is almost 8 years - Suit restored...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Restoration of complaint dismissed in default - When the complaint under the Act is dismissed for want of prosecution at the initial stage of issuing summons, then Court concerned has authority to recall the same and bar of S.362 Cr.P.C. will not be applied...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Restoration of complaint dismissed in default - When the complaint under the Act is dismissed for want of prosecution at the initial stage of issuing summons, then Court concerned has authority to recall the same and bar of S.362 Cr.P.C. will not be applied...........

Showing : 11-20 of 267 Results