Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99 -- Execution - Objection by pendente lite transferee - Pendente lite transferee who is purported to be a stranger to decree has every right to defend his right, title, interest and possession in decretal property as per O.21.R.99 CPC...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99 -- Execution - Objection by third party - Third party to the decree has a right to approach Court even after dispossession of immovable property which he was occupying and can seek redelivery...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 21, Rule 99 -- Execution - Objection by third party - Once an application U.O.21.R.99 CPC is filed, it is incumbent upon trial Court to consider all the rival claims including right, title and interest of parties U.O.21.R.101 CPC which bars a separate suit by mandating execution Court to decide the dispute...........
Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 100 -- Second appeal - Suit for cancellation of sale deeds - Plaintiff did not establish by cogent evidence regarding his status as that of an illiterate person so as to dislodge the sale deed and exercise of undue influence having not been proved - However, burden having been sufficiently discharged by defendant as regards due execution..........
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Agreement in question recites that defendant had received earnest money to the tune of Rs.16,00,000 out of total sale consideration of Rs.18,87,000 - Therefore, it does not stand to reason that plaintiff being a Police Constable would part with a huge sum of Rs.16,00,000 towards a transaction to purchase land and thereafter,..........
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Plaintiff being a Police Constable was mandatorily required to seek permission from his department before entering into an agreement to purchase property of a high value - However, admittedly, he did not seek any such permission from the department - It is not the case of plaintiff that he and defendant were on such close terms..........
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Co-owners - Execution of agreement by power of attorney holder - Agreement in question did not mention GPA or indicate that defendant No.1 was acting on behalf of his sisters/co-owners - Defendant No.1 signed the agreement solely in his capacity and there was no representation made to plaintiffs that he had the authority to bind..........
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Co-owners - Execution of agreement by power of attorney holder - Validity - Defendant No.1/power of attorney holder lacked the authority to bind defendant Nos.6 to 8 in the agreement to sell, as GPA did not confer upon him the power to sell the property on behalf of his sisters at the time of agreement, having been impliedly..........
Agreement to sell -- Minor's property - Agreement to sell executed by defendant No.1 on behalf of minors - No prior permission sought from Guardian Court for execution of agreement qua interest of minor - Said agreement being opposed to public policy and law could not be treated as valid agreement to give rise to cause of specific performance...........
Agreement to sell -- Specific performance - Execution of agreement to sell by defendant No.1 on behalf of herself and on behalf of other defendants including minors - No power of Attorney was there in favour of defendant No.1 and even no permission was sought from the Court of competent jurisdiction regarding selling of property of minors which is sine qua non as per..........
