LawMirror.com

Results of consumer

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2911-2920 of 4667 Results

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 15 -- Condonation of delay - Ground, misplacing of impugned order of the District Forum which was duly received by the appellant - Held that in case he was unable to locate the order, another copy could be applied from the District Forum - Ground not valid and genuine for condoning the delay - Appeal dismissed as barred by limitation...........

UTTAR PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, LUCKNOW

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d),(ii) -- Electricity Supply (Consumers) Regulations, 1984, Regulation 9 - Consumer - Electricity power connection - Power connection stood in the name of the late father of the complainant - Nowhere pleaded that any mutation having been done in that connection in the name of the complainant - Held that unless there is an..........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(e) -- Consumer dispute - Examination result - Non declaration of result for one and half years by the Board due to administrative failure by the Board - Plea of the Board that the Education Board is a statutory body and appearing in the examination is not a consumer dispute - Held statutory bodies are not immune from the ambit..........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Machine purchased for production of sugar for sale and earning profit - Complainant is not a consumer...........

WEST BENGAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Insurance Claim -- Discharge voucher - Respondent - Complainant failed to prove that her signature on the discharge voucher taken by misrepresentation fraud or by exercising undue influence or coercion - In the view of the matter, after receiving the amount in full and final settlement of her claim the complainant cannot approach a consumer court for payment of the balance..........

RAJASTHAN STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, JAIPUR

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 13 -- Insurance claim - Complex and complicated matter - Both the parties have placed all the relevant record and material before the Forum - Dismissal of the complaint directing the parties to approach civil court as it involves complex and complicated matter - Held that the District Forum should have decided the matter on merit as..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Housing - Consumer - Cancellation of allotment of flat on failure on the part of complainant to deposit the required amount - Plea that he applied for house building advance from GPF which has taken unusual time repelled - Held that no distinction can be made between the common consumer and the consumer who is a Government..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Housing - The first allotment of flat cancelled in August, 1990 and while second allotment cancelled in May, 1992 - The complaint filed in April, 1995 after more than two years without showing sufficient cause for delay held to be time barred...........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Medical service - Rs. 1800/- donated to charitable hospital for operation of eye - Held that it is nothing but a method of taking the fee in different form - Complainant is definitely consumer...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d), Railways Act, 1989, Section 100 -- Railway services - Theft and loss of suit case from the reserved berth - No bolts and hooks for the safety of luggage - Unauthorised person entered and taken away the suit case - Complainant tried to pull the chain but that was out of order - Railways held deficient in service by..........

Showing : 2911-2920 of 4667 Results