LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 3061-3070 of 8312 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualifications) Act, 1952, Section 2(a), Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, Section 11(g), Punjab Panchayati Raj Act, 1994, Section 208, Punjab Land Revenue (Lambardari) Rules, 1908, Rule 14, 15, 16 -- Circular issued by government debarring lambardar to contest elections as member of Panchayat - Held, office of lambardar..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Punjab State Legislature (Prevention of Disqualifications) Act, 1952, Section 2(a), Punjab State Election Commission Act, 1994, Section 11(g) -- Anganwari workers employed in various social welfare schemes of State of Punjab - They do not hold 'office of profit' - Held, not disqualified from seeking election to Gram Panchayat...........

WEST BENGAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CALCUTTA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Post Rules, Rule 39, 40 - Rural Postal Life Insurance Scheme - Surrender of policy - Refund of deposited amount - Claim for - As the policies of the complainants became void due to non-payment of premium within time and they surrendered the policies before completion of 36 months as per terms and conditions of the policies,..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - As regards possession and nature of property - Status quo order passed - Defendant in exclusive possession of suit property as per jamabandi - Most part of the property covered under abadi of defendant and only a small area lying vacant and that defendant does not want to raise any construction -..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Availing of services of OP No. 1 and 2 for the purpose of constructing a commercial building - The complainant has not been earning or deriving any profit - There was no nexus between the services availed and the process of profit making - Held that the complainant has not availed the..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)((g), 2(1)(r) -- Complaint maintainability - Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - The case of the complainant is based on deficiency of service and unfair practice on the part of the OPs in executing the work based on P1 and P3 agreements - Mere fact that there..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KERALA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C - 1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Availing of services of OP No. 1 and 2 for the purpose of constructing a commercial building - The complainant has not been earning or deriving any profit - There was no nexus between the services availed and the process of profit making - Held that the complainant has not availed the..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)((g), 2(1)(r) -- Complaint maintainability - Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - The case of the complainant is based on deficiency of service and unfair practice on the part of the OPs in executing the work based on P1 and P3 agreements - Mere fact that there..........

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C - 1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........

Showing : 3061-3070 of 8312 Results