LawMirror.com

Results of partition+of+huf

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 331-340 of 2279 Results

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs right to construct a compound wall as per Partition deed of 1963 - There is no time limit prescribed under said partition deed for plaintiffs to put up compound wall - Plaintiffs exercised their right to put up compound wall only in the year 1994 -..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Permanent injunction - Restraining defendants from interfering with plaintiffs right to construct a compound wall as per Partition deed - Defendants neither disputed partition deed nor established their right to claim adverse possession to prevent plaintiffs to exercise their right available to them under partition deed - Plaintiffs..........

TELANGANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Advocate Commissioner - For noting down physical features and topography of suit property - Partition suit - Suit filed for seeking partition of agricultural land - Even, assuming that suit is ultimately allowed, division of property would be required to be worked out by metes and bounds at the time of passing..........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - After commencement of trial - Suit for declaration and partition - Amendment sought for altering shares of parties - Proposed amendments are not in the nature of changing nature and character of suit - Amendment allowed with costs of Rs.1000/- considering delay...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Easements Act, 1882, Section 15, Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Right to pathway - Injunction suit - Right of way given to all parties under partition deed - There was thus, no necessity for an additional pathway running through entire extent of 69 cents - Contention of defendants that they do not have an alternative pathway is absolutely false statement -..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Partition suit -- Joint Family property - Alienation of suit property by defendant No.1 - Right of defendant No.1 to alienate suit property is negated and invalidated by two Courts below - Suit property is joint family property of father of both plaintiffs and defendant Nos 1, 2, 4 - Father of parties thus, has no right to bequeath suit property to defendant No.1, nor has..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 25 -- Permanent alimony - Husband disclosed that his father had 25 acres of land and after partition 5 acres of land is in the name of husband - Land in the name of husband is a valuable land - Permanent alimony of Rs.2 lakhs as awarded by trial Court is on lower side - Permanent alimony awarded as Rs.8 lakhs to wife...........

UTTARAKHAND HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47 -- Execution - Partition suit - Compromise decree - Objection as to inexecutability of decree - Compromise decree cannot be said to be inexecutable merely because property which came to defendant's share is possessed by some persons, who were not party to suit - Objection raised by defendant regarding executability of decree is..........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 8, Rule 1A -- Late production of documents - Partition suit - When prima facie documents are not concocted or false and same is registered wherein interest of defendant is prima facie made out and property in question is ancestral property, both parties have right to adduce evidence and to prove accordingly - Defendants permitted to..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(g) -- Wrongful dispossession - Allegation that accused not only blocked the passage of complainant but they have also encroached upon land belonging to complainant by erecting boundary wall - However, there is no evidence on record that land came to be occupied by accused after..........

Showing : 331-340 of 2279 Results