LawMirror.com

Results of consumer protection deficiency of service

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 431-440 of 893 Results

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Flat allotment - Delay in handing over possession - Compensation - Held that if the advertisements are made, in order to attract prospective buyers, and if by a public authority the word is not kept then no hesitation in fastening deficiency in service - Provision existing in terms of `payment of..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Manufacturing defect - Backhoe Loader manufactured by OP purchased by appellant -Manufacturing defect noticed during warranty period could not be rectified properly - Resulting in deficiency of service - Order of the State Commission directing refund of cost of equipment upheld with modification that appellant has to return..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3, 2(1)(g) -- Deposit refund - Deficiency in service - Additional remedy - Pendency of the petition before the Company Law Board or the High Court - It does not result in a ban on the functioning of the Consumer Fora - Section 3 of the Act is an additional remedy available to the Consumers - Consumer has a right to file complaint..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Insurance policy - Revival of - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Held that there was unjustifiable delay in reviving the policy - The act of demanding encashment certificate of cheque from the complainant was nothing but an act of harassment to the complainant as it was the duty of the LIC to verify their..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Airlines - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Non-joinder of - Ticket issued by KLM - But the flight whereby the boarding were denied to the complainant did not belong to them but to Cathay Pacific - Despite objections by OP Cathy Pacific not made a party - Held that the agency issuing the ticket cannot be..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r) -- Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - MDF Panels - Product sold by appellant which emits gases harmful to the human beings or its organs and not meeting its professional and market obligation to keep them painted in order to reduce its after-effects - Admission by appellant in its letter that the emission..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Employees Pension Scheme, 1995, Form 10 - Family pension - Grant of - Delay on the part of respondent No.3 not intentional but on account of the fact that in their record, wrong date of birth was mentioned - Further, no deficiency in service on the part of respondent Nos.1 and 2 because when the appellant applied for family..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Courier services - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Application form for H.P. Judicial Service sent on 03.04.2005 delivered on 03.05.2005 for which last date was 02.05.2005 - Expression of regret made by OP - Plea that OP liable to pay compensation upto Rs.100/- repelled - No document confirming a..........

PONDICHERRY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PONDICHERRY

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Education - Admission - Fee refund - Respondent No.2 who was admitted in appellant college left college on getting admission in some other institution - Fee refund sought - Not refunded by appellant-OP - Held that non refund of unutilized amount especially when the seat vacated by the 2nd complainant has been..........

PONDICHERRY CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, PONDICHERRY

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Education - Admission - Fee refund - Respondent No.2 who was admitted in appellant college left college on getting admission in some other institution - Fee refund sought - Not refunded by appellant-OP - Held that non refund of unutilized amount especially when the seat vacated by the 2nd complainant has been..........

Showing : 431-440 of 893 Results