LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 4651-4660 of 8453 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Housing - Collaboration/joint venture agreement - No element of hiring of 'service' respondents being the 'Consumers' - Order of the State Commission allowing complaint liable to be set aside...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2 -- Bar of subsequent suit - Tenant in unauthorised possession of house - Earlier suit filed for ejectment and damages - Relief of damages was given up - Subsequent suit for damages - Held, only the period for which claim for damages was filed earlier and given up is barred in view of O.23.R.1 CPC - Subsequent suit for damages for..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 2(s) , 10 -- Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14 Rule 2 - Domestic inquiry - Termination - Preliminary issue - Workman - Issue No. 3 with regard to the validity of two enquiries had already been treated as a preliminary issue and decided against the respondent/Management - After a lapse of about eight years the application filed by..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Protection of Policyholders Interest) (Amendment) Regulations, 2002 -- Regulation 2 to 4 - Regulation 2 to 4 - Regulation 2 to 4 - Insurance policy - Held that insurance company duty bound to follow the procedure prescribed in Regulations before issuing the insurance cover -..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Insurance policy - Insurance claim - Consumer - Commercial purpose - Plea that complainants being involved in commercial activities, therefore, not consumer repelled - Complainant are asking for being indemnified for the loss sustained by them - Part of the claim was paid by OP - If the complainant was not a 'consumer'..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority (Protection of Policyholders Interest) (Amendment) Regulations, 2002 -- Regulation 2 to 4 - Regulation 2 to 4 - Regulation 2 to 4 - Insurance policy - Non supply of - Insurance policy containing the terms and conditions were never supplied - Non compliance of provisions of..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(b) , 12(1)(c) -- Complainant - Joint complaint - Maintainability - The grievance of complainant who are husband and wife against OP 1 alleging termination of pregnancy without her consent in violation of MRTP Act - In the first instance complaint filed by husband - Subsequently wife added as co - complainant - So aggrieved party..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Medical service - Termination of pregnancy - Service rendered by OP No. 1 was gratis and not for payment of fees or promise of deferred payment - Complainants can be said to be having no locus standi to file consumer complaint for the deficiency in service on the part of OP No. 1...........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Medical negligence - Termination of pregnancy - Alleged accidental injury occurred in terms of perforation to uterus while undergoing D&C procedure - OP No. 1 took due and reasonable care and did exhibit professional skill such as Gynaecologist while treating complainant No.1 - In no way it could be held that she was..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),(r),14(h),(b) -- Damages - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Credit Card - Credit card insurance benefit - Denial of - Accidental insurance benefit provided on credit card - In addition to National Insurance Company there is mention of association of HSBC with TATA AIG Insurance as well - To the consumer card..........

Showing : 4651-4660 of 8453 Results