LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5101-5110 of 8312 Results

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Housing & Possession - Delay in delivery - Compensation - Possession delivered much after beyond the period of 3 years stipulated in letter of allotment - Appellant-complainant held entitled to interest @ 12% p.a. on the deposited amount from the respective date of deposits till the time of `offer-of-possession'..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39,, Rule 1, 2 -- Exclusive possession claimed on the basis of one entry in Jamabandi and Khasra Girdawari - Land in dispute described as 'Jumla Mustarka Malkan' - Change in entry in Jamabandi not supported by reason or the basis for such change - On the basis of stray entry in Jamabandi exclusive possession over the suit land cannot be..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 14, Rule 2 -- Preliminary issue - Issue of Will - Cannot be treated as preliminary issue...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(b)(iv) -- Complainant -Association - Complaint filed by appellant Association in respect of common facilities which were to b@ made available by the respondent-OP - The complainant-appellant held to be consumer - State Commission erred in dismissing th) complaint as on erroneous interpretation/comprehension of Section 2(1)(b) of..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Employee and his family members of Vishakapatnam Port Trust - Who are entitled to receive free-medical treatment as per their service conditions - Held to be consumer under the Consumer Protection Act...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Constitution of India, 1950, Article 12 - Plot allotment - Refund - State Housing Development Authorities like BDA or `State' within the meaning given in the Constitution - They are obliged to take care of the welfare of the people - Neither plot allotted nor money refunded - The respondents held deficient in..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Plot allotment - Deiay in delivery of possession - Interest - The failure on the part of petitioner to deliver possession within a reasonable time - Possession give after 8 years - Held to be a clear case of deficiency in service on the part of petitioner - Continuous cause of action - Complaint within time limit..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Flat allotment - Delay in handing over possession - Compensation - Held that if the advertisements are made, in order to attract prospective buyers, and if by a public authority the word is not kept then no hesitation in fastening deficiency in service - Provision existing in terms of `payment of..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Warranty - Backhoe Loader manufactured by OP purchased by appellant - Even though it is used for commercial/industrial purposes yet if any manufacturing defect occurs during the warranty period complainant held consumer and is entitled for protection under the Act...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Manufacturing defect - Backhoe Loader manufactured by OP purchased by appellant -Manufacturing defect noticed during warranty period could not be rectified properly - Resulting in deficiency of service - Order of the State Commission directing refund of cost of equipment upheld with modification that appellant has to return..........

Showing : 5101-5110 of 8312 Results