LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5261-5270 of 8312 Results

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 2(ia)(m), 7(i), 16(1)(a), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 378(1), 378(2) -- Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, R.5 - Ice-cream - Not proved to be manufactured and supplied by accused-manufacturer - Acquittal of manufacturer, proper...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 103-A - Insurance claim - Transfer of vehicle - Effect of - `A' intimated to the insurance company about the transfer of the vehicle in favour of its maternal aunt `B', though not in the prescribed form and sought transfer of the vehicle - No reply was given by the insurance company and in..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 103-A - Insurance claim - Transfer of vehicle - Effect of - `A' intimated to the insurance company about the transfer of the vehicle in favour of its maternal aunt `B', though not in the prescribed form and sought transfer of the vehicle - No reply was given by the insurance company and in..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Order 2, Rule 2 -- Agreement to mortgage - Possession delivered - Suit for injunction filed before accrual of cause of action for filing suit for specific performance - Suit for specific performance is not barred U.O.2.R.2 CPC nor suit is barred u/s 11 CPC as issues in earlier suit and suit for specific performance are entirely..........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, Section 16(1)(a)(i), 7(i), 2(ia), Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules, 1955, Rule 50 -- Sample of 'Dalda Vanaspathi' found adulterated - Delay in launching prosecution - No reason assigned for launching prosecution after a long period of delay of two years and nine months after receipt of report of analyst - Accused lost his..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 2, Rule 2 -- As per agreement, Mortgage deed is to executed and registered on 1.5.1978 - Suit for permanent injunction filed on 19.10.1977 - Later on, suit for recovery or in alternative suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement filed - Cause of action for filling subsequent suit arose on or after 1.5.1978 - Suit not..........

ORISSA CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 9 - Telegram - Reply paid telegram lost in transit - Non intimation to complainant held to be deficiency in service - OP-appeilant while transmitting message by means of Telegram can be said to be rendering public utility service - Cannot be considered strictly exercising sovereign power or..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(o) -- Service - Housing construction - Held that building activity relating to housing construction irrespective of the fact that whether the same relates to private bodies, Government bodies or statutory bodies are brought within purview of the Consumer Protection Act...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Punjab Agricultural Produce Markets Act, 1961, Section 23, Seeds Act, 1966, Section 2(a) -- Production of seeds - Whether Agricultural Produce - Whether Market Fee leviable - Procurement of agricultural produce for development of seeds - Seeds not specified agricultural produce - Not exigible to market fee...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2006
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 9, Rule 2 -- Suit - Dismissal on account of failure to get service of summons - Defendant Corporation represented by Counsel who is directed to appear - Dismissal ordered on wrong assumption - Order of dismissal recalled...........

Showing : 5261-5270 of 8312 Results