LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 7231-7240 of 8312 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Insurance claim - Complaint dismissed by District Forum on the ground that truck was only insured for the risk of Ore and theft and not for the accident - Terms of contract between the insured and insurer not appreciated - Led to error in the order of District Forum - Order set aside...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Maruti car - Booked for running as Taxi - Rebate in Central Excise Duty - Complaint for refund of Central Excise Duty - In order to avoid controversy complainants directed to send all papers once again - Assistant Collector of Central Excise to decide the matter regarding refund in accordance with law...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Insurance claim - Endorsement to drive the vehicle on hill roads need not be insisted upon - Date on which endorsement was made by the Licensing Authority to drive on hill roads is not material...........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(o) -- Consumer - Effort of the complainant is to hold a fishing enquiry to find out the defaulting/erring official of the High Court who had not despatched notice/summon in some case pending in the High Court - It is not the function of the fora established under the Act to go into such matters for the ulterior motive of helping..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Deficiency in service - Tractor/Tyres purchased on 23.05.1992 - Complaint filed on 07.11.1994 - Effect - Where the customer remained in active for such a long period in the absence of cogent evidence the finding of defect in tyres/rims arrived at by the District Forum could not be sustained...........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Allotment of plot - Deficiency in service - Name of appellant registered as an applicant - Fact that applicant was not considered for allotment at the appropriate time was a kind of continued deficiency on part of the respondent-Complainant held entitled to allotment of one kanal plot...........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Deficiency in service - Loan - Sanction of - Rs.1,000/- was charged by the respondent Corporation for appraisal of the project submitted by the complainant - It was only after the appraisal report that the project of the complainant was found a feasible one and the quantum of loan referred to above was sanctioned in his favour -..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 2 -- Questions relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction of decree u/s 47 can be exercised subject to the restriction placed by Order 21.R.2 which contain special provisions - Held, the general provision under S.47 had, therefore, to yield to the special provisions contained in O.21.R.2 - General provision must..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 2 -- Eviction petition - Compromise decree that tenant would vacate premises and hand over vacant possession to appellant or to her attorney - Premises not vacated - Execution - Objection filed u/s 47 and tenant pleaded that possession was handed over to attorney who allowed him to remain in possession as a licencee on..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 47, Order 21, Rule 2 -- Questions relating to execution, discharge or satisfaction of decree u/s 47 can be exercised subject to the restriction placed by Order 21.R.2 which contain special provisions - Held, the general provision under S.47 had, therefore, to yield to the special provisions contained in O.21.R.2 - General provision must..........

Showing : 7231-7240 of 8312 Results