LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 7291-7300 of 8312 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2 -- Loan - Pledge of gold jewellery - Loan repaid - Jewellery not returned - Complaint - Complainant directed to produce independent witness before the Opposite Party at the time of return of jewellery - Jewellery withheld without reasonable cause - Damages to the extent of Rs.3,000/- awarded...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(a) -- Big Buy Scheme of State Bank of India - Complainants alleging that they had booked various consumer durables under the said scheme - Had signed all requisite papers - Awaiting delivery of goods - Monthly instalments deducted from their salaries - Bank disbursing loan after receiving copies of challan of dealer with..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Insurance claim - Car accident - Local staff of respondent created unnecessary hurdle regarding identity of the engine - Was admittedly a second hand motor car - Registration number, present ownership were not disputed - No reason for this inordinate delay except deficiency on the part of the respondents from the very..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Medical negligence - Loss of eye - Complainant urging that other eminent doctors told her that her surgery was performed in a negligent manner by the respondent Doctor which resulted in permanent incurable disability in the eye - No name of any specialist named - Appears to be no evidence that respondent was negligent -..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Deficiency in service - Purchase of Car - Car found to be defective and having various problems - Claim for refund - Respondent pleading, that complainant never purchased the Car and hence not consumer - Transaction made through Finance Company - Would not render complaint not maintainable - Respondent directed to refund..........

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION PUNJAB CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1) -- Insurance policy - Plea that disputed questions arise in the case - Mere allegation made in the written statement that disputed questions arise in the case is not enough to relegate the complainants to civil court...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Telephone - Excessive Telephone Bill - District Forum quashed the bill and ordered for detailed investigation about the alleged excessive bill - Since the matter has to be investigated and it has yet to be determined whether the bill issued by the telephone authorities are correct or not, there is no question of ordering..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Car Loan - Complainant deposited the sum of Rs.40,000/- in cash and a further sum of Rs.17,628/- by means of four bank cheques and Rs.3,861/- by means of another cheque, totalling Rs.61,489/- Maruti Van was never delivered to the complainant by the respondents and the assurance contained in the letter dated 22.03.1991 that..........

CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Electronic typewriter - Deficiency in service - Complaint - Dismissed for want of evidence - No justification for interfering with the order especially because it is a case where the complaint was not supported even by any affidavit of the complainant...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Police aid - Dispute in respect of open land - Parties directed to maintain status quo - Police directed to ensure maintenance of status quo - Direction not specifying in what manner maintenance of status quo is to be ensured - Such direction cannot be sustained in law...........

Showing : 7291-7300 of 8312 Results