LawMirror.com

Results of licensee not entitled to injunction

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Directing defendants to vacate the suit property - Plaintiff is father of defendant No.1 - Suit property belongs to father - Nature of possession of defendants being that of a licensee and there is series of litigation between them - Concurrent findings of facts rendered by two Courts below would clearly show..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2021
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39 -- Mandatory injunction - Licence - Termination of licence - Owner of immovable property on termination of licence is entitled to maintain a suit for mandatory injunction against the licensee to vacate the property...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2018
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendant-owners from dispossessing respondent from suit hospital - Respondent is admittedly, running and is in possession of suit hospital for more than 13 years by three agreements - Respondent claims that he is a tenant while defendant-petitioner claim that respondent was a mere..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 37, 38 -- Injunction - Trespasser - Person in possession not owner or tenant or licensee - Status of such a person is that of a trespasser - Trespasser is not entitled to injunction against true owner...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2015
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38 -- Suit for permanent injunction - Possession in pursuance of oral agreement to sell - Injunction sought restraining defendant from eviction plaintiff otherwise than in due course of law and not to transfer the disputed land and interfere in the peaceful possession - Such unregistered agreement does not create any right of plaintiff -..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2013
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Easements Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Ad interim injunction - Licensee - In case of a license, if the licensor revokes the licence, the licensee is left with no legal right in the property and is, therefore, not entitled to temporary or permanent injunction against the licensor...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Easement Act, 1882, Section 64 -- Licence - Licensee is entitled to a reasonable time to leave the property on revocation of the licence and also to remove his good in such property - When licence is revoked without providing such reasonable time, he cannot claim an injunction to continue for user of the land after revocation of the licence - His remedy is only to sue for..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2000
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Licensee - After expiry of licence period is not entitled to injunction against his eviction or disturbance of possession against owner as his possession is that of a trespasser...........

ANDHRA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1989
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Licensee - After expiry of license period possession of licensee becomes unlawful - Hence, licensee is not entitled to injunction after expiry of license period. (Indian Easements Act, 1882, Ss.52, 62(c)...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1985
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction in a suit for injunction restraining defendant-Nagar Palika (Municipal Committee) from dispossessing plaintiff from Khokha otherwise than in due course of law - Licensor if revokes licence - Licensee left with no right in property - Not entitled to temporary or permanent injunction against licensor -..........

Showing : 1-10 of 10 Results