LawMirror.com

Results of consumer

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2961-2970 of 4728 Results

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Subrogation of right - Insurance company settled claim of consignor for short delivery of consignment - Letter of subrogation executed by consignor in favour of insurance company - Complaint filed by Insurance company claiming compensation from carrier and consignor also joined as complainant - Held that..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Both the complainant as well as the respondent who is consignor of the goods are Public Limited Companies manufacturing and dealing in pharmaceutical - The consignment of pharmaceutical goods was consigned for delivery at Lagos through respondents - The services available and rendered were..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14(1),(d) -- Compensation - The complainant is required to prove the actual loss suffered by him for which the compensation has been claimed...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3, Tamil Nadu Co-operative Societies Act, 1983, Section 90,156 -- Additional remedy - Bar of jurisdiction of civil court - Dispute between member and management of the co-operative society - Merely because the rights and liabilities are created between the members and the management of the appellant-society under the Co-operative..........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14(1),(d) -- Compensation - Interest - Where interest has been given, compensation is not necessary and should not be given...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(d) -- Maturity amount - Non payment of - Compensation - District Forum holding deficiency in service and directing OP to pay the maturity amount - No compensation awarded - Held that the keeping in view the maturity amount of Rs. 31,700/- Rs. 3,000/- would be just and fair compensation for deficiency in service...........

UTTARANCHAL STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(e) -- Housing - Consumer dispute - Outright purchase at an auction sale - Sale deed, lease deed, brochure agreement did not show any civil amenities but the purchasers are entitled that - There was no arrangement of hiring of service for consideration between the parties - Not a consumer dispute - At the most it can be a case of..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

UTI -- Maturity amount of Units of GMIS 92 scheme - Cheque sent by UTI encashed fraudulently by some one - Held that the respondent-original complainant cannot be made to suffer on the lapses on the part of erring parties-UTI or Post office or Bank - Whether the cheque are lost during transit or they are encashed fraudulently by the Bank in collusion with some person, it..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Housing -- Complicated issues - Contract for flat and garage - Dispute regarding validity and legality of contract and also liability of Company for the acts of the Project Manager - Held that these issues cannot adequately and appropriately be gone into and considered in the summary jurisdiction given to the Consumer Disputes Redressal Agencies - It is the Civil Court of..........

M.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 14,17 -- Complicated questions of fact - Complaint alleging deficiency in service on the part of OP in as much as that without any sufficient cause it took possession of the Hydraulic Excavator from him purchased under a hire purchase agreement - Complainant alleging that the documents filed by OP in its defence are forged documents..........

Showing : 2961-2970 of 4728 Results