LawMirror.com

Results of consumer

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 851-860 of 4809 Results

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Electricity Act, 2003, Sections 50 and 126 - Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission (Electricity Supply Code 85 Related Matters) Regulations, 2005, Regulation 2.1.1 - Electricity meter - Tampering with the meter - Report of the Laboratory that the meter was tampered with - The fact that the small hole on the top of the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d)(i) -- Consumer - Goods purchased for commercial purposes and/or service hired or availed for commercial purposes - Not a consumer within the meaning of the Act - Complaint not maintainable...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revision petition - New plea - No new ground can be permitted to be taken at the stage of revision. (Para 5) Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Sections 2(1)(b)(iv), 2(1)(r), 12(1)(c), 13(6) and 14(a) to (i) - Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1 Rule 8 - Cold drink - Excess charge - Unfair trade practice - Representative..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revision petition - New plea - No new ground can be permitted to be taken at the stage of revision. (Para 5) Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Sections 2(1)(b)(iv), 2(1)(r), 12(1)(c), 13(6) and 14(a) to (i) - Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 1 Rule 8 - Cold drink - Excess charge - Unfair trade practice - Representative..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Insurance claim - Amount of Rs.2,00,000/- released in favour of the appellant on 05.11.2004 - This amount was received by the appellant on 01.03.2005 without reserving any right to claim interest on the delayed payment and it was accepted without any protest - By sending letter dated 02.04.2007 to the respondent..........

UTTARAKHAND STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, DEHRADUN

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Motor vehicle - Deficiency in service - Dealers liability - Appellant manufacturer not liable to replace the engine as the warranty period has expired due to negligence of the selling dealer - respondent No.2 - The original engine appears to have never been repaired/reconditioned by the dealer - Respondent No.2..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Interest -Inordinate delay of 5 years in repudiation cannot be called a reasonable period required for settling the claim - The claim of the petitioner registered with the OP on 11.07.2002 - Allowing the period of about 5 months even from the date..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Revision against the impugned order on behalf of respondents 1 and 2-OPs was dismissed on ground of limitation as well as on merits - Plea that since the revision petition against the same order was dismissed the order of Fora below stands confirmed hence revision by the..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Deficiency in service - Compensation - Interest -Inordinate delay of 5 years in repudiation cannot be called a reasonable period required for settling the claim - The claim of the petitioner registered with the OP on 11.07.2002 - Allowing the period of about 5 months even from the date..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Revision against the impugned order on behalf of respondents 1 and 2-OPs was dismissed on ground of limitation as well as on merits - Plea that since the revision petition against the same order was dismissed the order of Fora below stands confirmed hence revision by the..........

Showing : 851-860 of 4809 Results