LawMirror.com

Results of 138 of n i act notice

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 501-510 of 1066 Results

CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Wrong cheque number mentioned in demand notice and complaint - Mistake in one figure only - During the period of transaction only one cheque issued by the accused in the name of complainant which was dishonoured - Accused did not reply the demand notice on the ground that wrong cheque number was..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Notice - Bank memo received on 5.5.1997 - Notice issued on 21.5.1997 - Notice not sent within 15 days of receipt of information regarding dishonour of cheque - Accused acquitted - Order upheld...........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Cheques issued by accused in lieu of supply of glass bottles by complainant - Cheque when presented for encashment dishonoured with endorsement `stop payment' - Before filing complaint for dishonour of cheque, complainant complied all the mandatory procedure - No reply was given by accused to the..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - If the complainant calls upon the accused to make payment at a place mentioned in the demand notice and the accused fails to make payment at that place, part of cause of action arises at that place...........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Registered office of complainant at Mumbai, purchase order placed at Mumbai, statutory notice issued from Mumbai and accused was called upon to pay the amount at Mumbai, cheque was deposited at Mumbai and it was dishonoured at Mumbai - Held, Court at Mumbai has jurisdiction...........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 143, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 177, 178, 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Lack of territorial jurisdiction - Cheque in question was drawn on a bank situated at R.N.Mukherjee Road, Kolkata and cheque was dishonoured by said bank - Demand notice was served upon complainant at his address at Kolkata - Held, Court at..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, 141 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Notice - Limitation - Starts to run from the date when notice is delivered and not from the date when acknowledge is received...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Lack of territorial jurisdiction - Cheque drawn and dishonoured in Mumbai - Notice sent from Delhi but was served in Mumbai - Held, Delhi Court does not have territorial jurisdiction to entertain complaint - Complaint returned for presentation before competent Court - Application allowed...........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138 -- Dishonour of cheque - Jurisdiction - Cheque was issued at `B' and the same was presented and dishonoured at `B' - Complainant residing at `P' and notice also issued from `P' - Held, court at `P' had territorial jurisdiction to try complaint...........

MADRAS HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2010
Details

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, Section 138, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Dishonour of cheque - Complaint - Quashing of - Petitioner/accused sought quashing of complaint on ground that respondent/complainant was acting mala fidely and this will be borne out by the fact that though he had received notice in September 2004, he had preferred a complaint to..........

Showing : 501-510 of 1066 Results