LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 4411-4420 of 8323 Results

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 2(2), Order 1, Rule 9, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 4 -- Decree - Binding nature on a legal representative not impleaded - Ordinarily a decree is not binding upon a legal heir who is not impleaded but some of the exceptions are : when estate of deceased was sufficiently represented or when plaintiff had impleaded all the..........

MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(b) , 2(1)(d) -- Complainant - Consumer - Beneficiary - Vehicle finance - Locus standi - Financier of vehicle - He being beneficiary is competent to file and prosecute a complaint under the provisions of CP Act...........

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Education - BAMS course - The college misrepresented the students with regard to the recognition and affiliation - Due to non - availability of these documents, college unable to conduct examination of BAMS - Definitely amounts to unfair trade practice - Respondents liable to refund the amount..........

MADHYA PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 157 -- Insurance claim - Transfer of vehicle - Intimation not given to the appellant - insurer - Held that unless the policy is transferred in the name of the purchaser, the latter cannot claim any compensation from the Insurance Company...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 - Pension - Claim rejected on account of ineligibility on ground of crossing the age of 60 years prior to coming into force of scheme - Case of petitioner fully established from declaration form forwarded by employer to respondent No. 1 and thereafter admission of respondent No. 1 himself and..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Restraining defendants from interfering in peaceful possession - Municipal Committee rightful owner of the property - Plaintiff in possession - The government holds the property as a trustee of the people and where any attempt is made by an individual or group of individuals to misappropriate/misuse..........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Co-sharer - Sale of specific khasra numbers - Plaintiff in possession of which specific khasra numbers not shown - Partition not reflected in revenue record - Subsequent vendee would hold the land as a co-sharer and would not be in exclusive possession of any portion of the joint holding till..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), Contract Act, 1872, Section 182 -- Consumer - In terms of agreement, LECA was not an agent of the petitioner for sale, purchase, installations of the equipment manufactured by the petitioner - The installation of equipment in the complainant's premises was undertaken by the LECA as an independent entity - If LECA found any..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Housing - Flat allotment - Demand letter - Service of letter - Final demand letter sent to the address by which time complainant has left this place - Final demand letter not sent to permanent address - Deficiency in service upheld...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) , 13(1)(c) -- Seeds - Hybrid chilly seeds - Defective growth - Expert report - Opinion of Expert remained unrebutted - Petitioner - producer had seed with them could have got that tested in the field and submitted a report to counter the Expert's Report - This has not been done - Loss assessed considering the 10 quintals per..........

Showing : 4411-4420 of 8323 Results