LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 5771-5780 of 8323 Results

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Advocate - Appointed commissioner by Court - Delay in inspecting sight- Allegations of deficiency in service - Merely because the complainant paid remuneration to the Commissioner as ordered by the Court, it cannot be said that there has been hiring of service of the opposite party by the complainant -..........

MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Transport service - Held that transport service is a `service' as defined in Section 2(1) (o) and a person availing or hiring any such service is a consumer under clause (d) of Section 2(1) of the Act...........

MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Carriers Act, 1865, Section 9 -- Transport service - Deficiency in service - Necessary party - Two consignments were entrusted to the opposite party a common carrier for being taken to its destination - OP failed to carry and deliver the goods to the consignees as required by the complainant-consignor - The OP held to be..........

CHHATTISGARH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, RAIPUR

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Common carrier - Services of Transport availed - Payment deferred till the delivery of goods - Complainant held consumer...........

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(c) -- Complaint - Fixed deposit Receipts - Maturity value - Non payment of - Complaint regarding against the non Executive Directors - Deposits made in company incorporated under the provision Companies Act which is a Juristic person - Directors or Managing Directors cannot be proceeded for realization of amounts due from the..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 149(2)(a)(ii), 147, 2(10), 3 -- Learner's driving licence - Is also a valid licence...........

M.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2004
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Bus in question was commercial vehicle and was registered as a passenger vehicle and was also insured under the policy titled as Commercial Vehicle `B' Policy - Cannot be treated as consumer dispute to be decided under this Act - On this count complaint liable to fail...........

WEST BENGAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(d) -- Consumer - Electric connection - Applicant for - He is a potential user of electricity and ready to pay the installation charges and hiring charges of electricity - Falls within the definition of `consumer' as defined in the CP Act...........

WEST BENGAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOLKATA

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Indian Electricity Act, 1910, Section 24 -- Electricity connection - Installation of a new meter in premises No.35-B - Application for - Communication sent that there is outstanding dues in the name of `K' of premises No. 35-A and if she interested to get new electric connection she is liable to pay the said outstanding..........

TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

Year of decision: 2003
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Post Office Act, 1898, Section 48 -- Postal Service - Money order - Non delivery of money order even after lapse of seven months - Duplicate money order sent - Held that it will not absolve the department from liability - Appellant department would not entitled to any exemption in terms of Section 48 of the 1898 Act as it is..........

Showing : 5771-5780 of 8323 Results