LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 7031-7040 of 8323 Results

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14 -- Railways Claims Tribunal Act, 1987, Ss.13, 15 & 28 - Railways Act, S.138 - Refund of excess amount charged as penalty' - Jurisdiction -Plea of the Railways that Consumer Fora has no jurisdiction to entertain the same in view of the provisions of Railways Claims Tribunal Act - Held that the said penalty of Rs.50/-..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14 -- Dry Cleaner - Saree - Colour found faded and there were stretches on it - Deficiency on the part of the respondent Dry Cleaner proved - Entitled to 75% of the price of Saree and also entitled to Rs.150/- on account of harassment...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Air Conditioner - Unsatisfactory performance - Handed over to the appellant for repair after 11 months - Compressed replaced free of charge - Complainant unwilling to collect the air-conditioner - District Forum ordered payment of entire price of Air-conditioner together with interest @ 18% and a sum of Rs.2000/- on account..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A, Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 10, Constitution of India, 1950, Article 215 -- Contempt of Court - Wilful disobedience must be proved beyond all shadow of doubt - Knowledge about ad interim order cannot be presumed on the basis of bald allegations about its communication to the Counsels for non-petitioners -..........

ORISSA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 2-A -- Injunction - Violation - Proof - The provisions for punishment of violating the order of injunction are to be strictly applied and this should be proved by preponderance of probability - New construction in violation of injunction when commenced to be proved by positive evidence and in absence of such positive evidence,..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Plot - Allotment order in 1991 - Price of plot deposited - Appellants were unable to deliver a suitably developed plot to the complainant for a period of five years - Order of the District Forum for refund of the price deposited by the complainant along with interest @ 18% affirmed...........

PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Plaintiff seeking injunction restraining defendant from raising construction of building on the part of road which is just in front of his factory - Status quo ordered - Tehsildar directed to go personally on the spot and get land demarcated through Kanungo and Patwari - Tehsildar reported no portion of relevant Khasra has..........

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2, 14 -- Insurance Policy - Repudiation - Ground that there was concealment of fact regarding the disease at the time of obtaining the policy - Treatment got by insured in the year 1988 - Insured herself in 1993 - Death in 1996 - Not agreed that there was any concealment of facts on the part of the deceased with regard to any previous..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, Section 19(1)(b), 2(c) -- Election petition - Transfer application - Allegations made against the Judges - Ex facie contumacious and scurrilous attack intended to scandilise the Court - Initiation of contempt proceedings against appellant - Justified - Award of imprisonment for a period of three months - Upheld...........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION UNION TERRITORY CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 1997
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14 -- Courier Service - Deficiency in Service - Specific condition prominently printed on the receipt limiting liability to the extent of Rs.100/- - Held that the complainant shall be entitled to the refund of Rs.40/- charges for the transportation of the packet - A sum of Rs.140/- ordered to be paid - Compensation of..........

Showing : 7031-7040 of 8323 Results