LawMirror.com

Results of 2

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 7611-7620 of 8453 Results

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(a) -- Flat - Having structural defects - Compensation - Flat constructed by A.W.H.O. - Complaint dismissed by State Commission by holding that it had no jurisdiction against organisation - Order set aside - AWHO not rendering any service free of charge but is engaged in the systematic activity of construction of houses/flats for..........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Implementation - Police help - Court is not precluded from issuing direction to police for enforcement of order of temporary injunction at the instance of party apprehending disobedience of that order - Held, remedy provided under Rule 2(a) of O.39 is not exhaustive and Court can pass appropriate..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Plaintiff not party to proceedings u/s 145 Cr.P.C. but dispossessed by reason of order under that Section - Order in said proceeding not binding on plaintiff - Plaintiff can espouse and establish his cause in suit despite order u/s 145 Cr.P.C. - Injunction can be granted when suit property is..........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 11, Order 2, Rule 2 -- If a part of claim in a suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, it does not operate as res judicata or bar action U.O.2.R.2 as it is not a decision on merits...........

DELHI HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 1, 2 -- If a part of the claim in a suit is dismissed for want of jurisdiction or struck off U.O.6.R.16, leave of Court is not required to file a fresh suit in the Court of proper jurisdiction...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Settled possession - Party must show in what capacity he came into possession of property - Whether as tenant or as licensee or adverse possession - Relief to be refused when party failing to prove his possession and his legal right...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Granting or refusing to grant is purely at discretion of trial Court - Appellate Court not to interfere with order of trial Court unless order is shown to be perverse...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Limitation Act, 1963, Section 5, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 22, Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 -- Death of one of the respondents - Legal representatives and heirs of deceased respondent could not be brought on record due to mistake of Court - Party cannot be penalised for it - Court allowed substitution of L.R's by condoning delay - Held, such order not to be interfered with..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 2(a) -- Written agreement is a pre-condition for reference to the arbitrators - As there was no concluded contract, there existed no arbitration agreement for reference to the arbitrators...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 1996
Details

Arbitration Act, 1940, Section 2(a), Evidence Act, 1872, Section 115 -- Non existence of a valid arbitration agreement - Appellant nominated the arbitrator and submitted to its jurisdiction - Held, that acquiescence does not confer jurisdiction...........

Showing : 7611-7620 of 8453 Results