Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 384, 506, 511, 34 -- Offence u/ss 384, 506, 511, 34 IPC - Evidence of PW1 was not specific as to who had entered into chamber and demanded hafta amount of Rs.500 - When there is no overt act of accused, conviction should not be recorded on the basis of assumption and presumption - Conviction and sentence set aside - Accused acquitted...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 384, 406 -- Offence u/s 384, 406 IPC - Quashing of proceedings - Basic ingredients of offence in question not proved against accused - No useful purpose is likely to be served by allowing criminal prosecution - Proceedings quashed...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 384 -- To attract the offence u/s 384 IPC twin ingredients are to be satisfied, viz. (i) Intentionally putting a person in fear of injury to himself or another; (ii) Dishonestly inducing the person so put to deliver to any person any property or valuable security...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 384, 506 -- Offence u/ss 323, 384, 506 IPC - Time, place and manner of incident forthcoming from witnesses are not only consistent but also in tune with their respective statements recorded u/s 161 Cr.P.C - Nothing could be elicited by defence to shake the credibility of PWs - Version of informant is akin to FIR story as well as..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 384, 506, Probation of Offenders Act, 1958, Section 4 -- Offence u/ss 323, 384, 506 IPC - Benefit of probation - Incident occurred in 1994 when accused was only 43 years old and now he is 73 years old - Case is disposed of after 30 years - Keeping in view of age of accused, he be released on admonition under Probation of Offenders Act..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 384, 406, 423, 467, 468, 420, 120B -- Quashing of FIR - Offence u/ss 323, 384, 406, 423, 467, 468, 420, 120B IPC - Ingredients to attract offence and nature of allegations contained in application filed by respondent would undoubtedly make it clear that respondent had failed to make specific..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 384, 406, 423, 467, 468, 420, 120B -- Quashing of FIR - Offence u/ss 323, 384, 406, 423, 467, 468, 420, 120B IPC - Ingredients to attract offence and nature of allegations contained in application filed by respondent would undoubtedly make it clear that respondent had failed to make specific..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 384, 420, 195, 506, 211, 120B -- Offence u/ss 384, 420, 195, 506, 211, 120-B IPC - Petition u/art 226 of Constitution for quashing of FIR - Maintainability - Prima facie case is made out against accused, which requires a detailed investigation to be carried out by authorities - Case does not fall under category of rarest of rare cases -..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 384, 120B, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Cheating - Quashing of FIR - Complainant alleged in the complaint that accused misbehaved with him and his wife on mobile phone twice or thrice using abusive languages and threatened them with dire consequences - It is not alleged in the complaint that accused or her family..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 384, 511, 506 -- Quashing of FIR - Offence u/ss 384, 511, 506 - No overt act alleged in FIR and it has only been vaguely stated that accused is threatening to implicate complainant in a false rape case - Provision of S.506 IPC not attracted - Even with respect to offence of extortion/attempt to..........
