LawMirror.com

Results of 39

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1-10 of 2448 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Trade mark - Restraining defendant from using trade mark, label and logo - Interim injunction granted on prima facie factual finding that colour of packaging material and photo, designs used in both the labels are similar and without detailed analysis, difference cannot be made out and that it can lead..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, 4 -- Ex parte interim injunction - Appeal - Defendant has a remedy to move application for setting aside ex parte order U.O.39.R.4 CPC - Appeal on behalf of defendant is not maintainable, hence, dismissed...........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Commercial Courts Act, 2015, Section 12A -- Ex parte interim injunction - Pre-institution meditation - Defendant is interfering in operation of petrol pump in question - There was thus an urgent need of interim relief - Provision of S.12-A of Commercial Courts Act not attracted...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 39, Easements Act, 1882, Section 52 -- Licence - Defendants have been in possession of suit land exclusively and have been using it admittedly for the last 22-23 years - There is no iota of evidence on record that any amount was being paid as licence fee, nor was it recorded in the revenue document that defendants were in possession as a..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Encroachment - Court below on basis of report of Mauka Commissioner and while considering other material available on record, has reached to prima facie conclusion that comparative measurements of land purchased by plaintiff and measurements of patta issued in favour of `R' from whom..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7 -- Appointment of Commissioner - Commissioner found possession of plaintiff proved but he has not indicated the khasra number at which such possession is situated - Defendant yet to file his written statement - If defendant files written statement with assertion that possession which plaintiff is claiming is not on the land..........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Partition suit - Property in question is till date a joint property - Plaintiff is co-sharer and there being a prima facie case having been made out and also having balance of convenience and inconvenience in his favour - Order of status quo thus, passed in respect of suit land in respect of parties..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Co-sharers - Co-sharer cannot be restrained from raising construction over joint land unless it is shown that such an act would constitute prejudice and mere raising of construction does not amount to any prejudice - Application rightly rejected...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Interim order of deposit of rent - Trial Court without deciding an application for temporary injunction passed order directing vendee to deposit the rent - It was not appropriate to pass such an order directing vendee to deposit rent after collecting it from tenants particularly when sale deed has..........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2024
Details

Specific Relief Act, 1963, Section 38, 39 -- Permanent prohibitory and mandatory injunction - Land in question is joint - Since, defendants are trying to occupy the portion of joint land and exclude plaintiffs from its use, they are entitled to seek relief of prohibitory injunction and mandatory injunction - They need not seek relief of partition or declaration of title...........

Showing : 1-10 of 2448 Results