Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Identification of accused - Accused were Marathi speaking - However, PW8 stated that culprits had spoken with him in Hindi - Therefore, if accused were to speak with victims they would have spoken in Marathi and not in Hindi - There is..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Forensic evidence - No forensic evidence is on record which corroborates the prosecution case - DNA samples were collected during investigation and in fact sent for DNA analysis, but prosecution never presented report to Court - No public..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Recovery of white metal silver chain - No stolen property found or recovered from any of accused except broken white metal chain, though prosecution alleged that many things were stolen - Recovery of white metal silver chain without any..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Defective investigation - Prosecution suppressed the material fact from Court - PW8 immediately after incident identified four persons from album of photographs of notorious criminals - Nothing on record whether those four persons who were..........
Evidence Act, 1872, Section 9, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Test Identification Parade (TIP) - Source of light at the spot - Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - PW1 and PW8 identified accused in TIP as well as before Court - Incident occurred at 10.30 p.m - There was light or not in hut not mentioned in..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Testimony of PW8, who claims to be an eye witness is not reliable and trustworthy - Her testimony in Court is full of material omissions/contradictions/improvements - PW8 not stated true facts - Even, prosecution suppressed the material..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 173(8), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Further investigation - Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Investigation of case is not fair - Prosecution suppressed the material fact from Court - PW8 immediately after incident identified four persons from album of..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - False implication - Compensation - All accused who were nomadic tribes are falsely implicated and roped in the case - Except one all of them are in jail since last 16 years - All of them facing sword of death penalty - Out of six accused..........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 302, 395, 396, 397, 398, 307, 376(2)(g), 34 -- Murder of five persons, robbery and rape of one lady - Defective investigation - Direction issued to Chief Secretary, Home Department, State to enquire the matter and take departmental action against erring officers/officials, if those are still in service...........
Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 396 -- Dacoity with murder - Accused allegedly broke the doors of house of informant and assaulted inmates of house with pieces of wood - Recovery of bloodstained sticks from orchard and FSL report proves the said circumstance with no manner of doubt - Confessional statement of accused itself depicts motive of team of accused in pursuit of..........
