LawMirror.com

Results of 43+evidence+

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 241-250 of 461 Results

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 2-A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 23, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section , Order 43, Rule 1-A -- Undertaking given in terms of temporary injunction - Suit withdrawn - Without getting the suit restored, undertaking given cannot be enforced...........

CALCUTTA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 7, Rule 11, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43 -- Order returning plaint for presentation before appropriate court - Held, not appealable...........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(2), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 -- Ad interim injunction order - Appeal thereagainst - Maintainability - Ad interim order of status quo passed u/s 151 - Held, order was passed u/s. 151, CPC, it cannot be inferred that such an order was not capable of being passed..........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Electricity Act, 2003, Section 43 -..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 104(2), Order 43, Rule 1(t) -- Bar u/s 104(2) - Applicability - Appeal - Dismissal for want of prosecution - Restoration application filed along with application for condonation of delay rejected - Appeal thereagainst - Held, it would be an appeal U.O.43.R.1(t) r/w S.104 of CPC and not intra court appeal or Letter Patent Appeal - Hence..........

BOMBAY HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(u), Partnership Act, 1932, Section 69(2A) -- Remand - Appeal against - Suit for dissolution of unregistered partnership firm - Maintainability - Since S.69(2-A) of the Act is held to be unconstitutional, a suit by a partner of unregistered firm for dissolution for accounts and for realization of his share is maintainable...........

GUJARAT HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 23, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1A -- Compromise decree - Appeal against - Maintainability of - Objections were raised before trial court U.O.23.R.3 of CPC in passing decree based on agreement or compromise - Held, appeal u/s 96(1) would be maintainable...........

PUNJAB & HARYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(r), Constitution of India, 1950, Article 227 -- Suit for possession by way of specific performance of agreement to sell - Along with suit, application for interim injunction also filed on which parties directed to maintain status quo regarding possession and alienation - Plaintiff petitioner filed applications under order 39..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

M.P.Vinirdishta Bhrashta Acharan Nivaran Adhiniyam, 1982, Section 39,6,43, Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 193 -- Cognizance of offence under Section 6 - Appellants convicted for minor offence - Cognizance of offence cannot be taken under Section 6 of Adhiniyam unless case is committed by Magistrate - Held, conviction improper as Special Judge took cognizance..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, Section 42, 43 -- Chance recovery - Police on patrol duty - There was no previous information or personal knowledge - Recovery from a public place - Held, it is S.43 which is applicable and not S.42 of the Act...........

Showing : 241-250 of 461 Results