Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) -- Offence u/ss 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act - Mere statement of aggrieved person would prima facie disclose ingredients for offences u/ss 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Act...........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 227, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) -- Discharge - Offence u/ss 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act - Complainant made specific allegation against accused that he abused her by calling her caste name in public place - Mere fact that in the statement of other witnesses no..........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(s) -- Offence u/s 3(1)(s) of the Act - Merely abusing a member of a Scheduled Caste or a Scheduled Tribe would not be enough - At the same time, saying caste name would not constitute an offence...........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) -- Offence u/ss 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of the Act - Nothing on record to indicate that alleged acts of appellant were motivated for the reason that complainant is a member of SC or ST - Neither FIR nor charge sheet contains any whisper of an allegation of insult or intimidation..........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), (s), Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 482 -- Offence u/s 3(1)(r), (s) of the Act - Quashing of proceedings - Alleged incident occurred near graveyard situated in village which comes within public place and public view - Therefore, prima facie offence established u/s 3(1)(r),..........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(g), (s) -- Offence u/s 3(1)(g), (s) of the Act - Quashing of FIR - No allegation that casteist slur was made in a place within public view or that there was any member of public present at the spot - In any event, allegations in First Information Statement itself are found to be..........
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, Section 483, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 325, 452, 506, 147, 149, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), (s) -- Bail - Offence u/ss 323, 325, 452, 506, 147, 149 IPC and S.3(1)(r), (s) of SC/ST Act - Appellant is in custody since 05.6.2025 - No specific injury has been..........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(1)(f), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 447 -- Offence u/s 3 of SC/ST Act and S.447 IPC - Place of occurrence was stated to be house, while all the witnesses spoke of the alleged incident having occurred in the field, which was the disputed land - In any event, there is..........
Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 438, Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 307, 511, 343, 419, 506, 120B, 34, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) -- Anticipatory bail - Offence u/ss 307, 511, 343, 419, 506, 120B, 34 IPC and Ss.3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), 3(2)(va) of SC/ST Act - There is only one alleged..........
Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s), Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, 504 -- Offence u/ss 3(1)(r), 3(1)(s) of SC/ST Act and Ss.323, 504 IPC - No allegation that applicant abused informant by using casteist words - Ingredients of an offence under SC/ST Act not made out - But there is an allegation that..........
