LawMirror.com

Results of c+p+c+o 1+r+10

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1991-2000 of 8245 Results

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Ad interim injunction - Police assistance to implement order - Application dismissed and stay vacated by holding that at the time of grant of ad interim injunction plaintiff failed to apprise Court with regard to filing of caveat by defendant - Impugned order set aside - Matter remitted for decision afresh...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 323, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, Section 3(1)(x) -- Offence u/s 323 IPC and S.3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act - Incident took place in the residential quarter of PW14, who is daughter of complainant - However, PW14 not supported prosecution case - Genesis of case is suppressed by prosecution - No..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 121, 121A, 122, 34, Arms Act, 1959, Section 25, 27(1), 29(A), Telegraph Act, 1885, Section 20, Wireless Telegraphy Act, 1933, Section 6(1)(A) -- Offences u/ss 121, 121-A, 122, 34 IPC, 25, 27(1), 29(A) of Arms Act, S.20 of Telegraph Act and S.6(1)(A) of Wireless Telegraphy Act - Prosecution essentially relied upon confessional statement of..........

KERALA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 32, Rule 15, 3, Divorce Act, 1869, Section 10(1)(iii), 10(1)(x) -- Appointment of guardian ad idem - Unsoundness of mind - Suit for divorce on ground of cruelty by wife and mental disorderliness - Failure of Court to assign definite reason for declining request for referring respondent to Medical Board - Under O.32.R.15 CPC Court is not..........

MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Court Fees Act, 1870, Section 12, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 107(1) -- Determination of Court-fees - Power of first appellate Court u/s 12 of Court-fees Act - First appellate Court is competent to adjudicate the issue in respect of amount of fees payable in appeal as well as in suit - However, Court-Fees Act being substantive law in respect of payment of court..........

ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 43, Rule 1(r), Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Appeal - Interim order, restraining defendant from interfering or doing any illegal activities in relation to suit property granted during pendency of application for temporary injunction without recording reasons - Order is interlocutory order and not temporary injunction..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 151, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Temporary injunction - Plaintiff and defendant both filed injunction application against each other - Trial Court dismissed both the applications - Defendant felt aggrieved by dismissal of his application filed appeal which was allowed - Plaintiff felt aggrieved and filed writ petition - High Court in writ..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 1, 2 -- Interim injunction - Granted by Bombay Civil Court and said injunction was confirmed by High Court while dismissing appeal from order - Interim injunction continued for last more than 5 years - No reason to interfere in the matter - Bombay Civil Court directed to dispose of the suit as expeditiously as possible...........

KARNATAKA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Indian Penal Code, 1860, Section 420, 120B, Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, Section 11, 12, 13(2), 13(1)(b), (d) -- Criminal offence by company - Company alone can be prosecuted without its directors or a person in charge of affairs of company...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2019
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 47, Rule 1 -- Review - High Court exceeded scope of review jurisdiction as if it was sitting in appeal over earlier judgment - To justify exercise of review jurisdiction, error must be self evident - Even assuming that there was no correct appreciation of facts and law in challenge to decision in earlier judgment, parties could be left to..........

Showing : 1991-2000 of 8245 Results