LawMirror.com

Results of consumer+case+limitation

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1951-1960 of 4815 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A, Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 14 -- Limitation - Exclusion of time - The complainant was agitating the matter in right earnest and just made an attempt to safeguard interest by filing civil suit - Withdrawing civil suit in view of the order of the State Commission - Exclusion of time spent in earlier proceedings by State..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), Contract Act, 1872, Section 2 -- Bank locker - Hiring of locker - The complainant was a minor on the date there was proposal of his sister to hire the locker jointly along with the complainant for the benefit of the complainant - The Bank cannot avoid such a contract after the complainant had attained majority on the specious..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Banking service - Locker hiring - Sister of the complainant entered into contract of hiring locker for the benefit of complainant, who was minor, and his mother - It has been established by the complainant that gold ornaments belonged to mother of the complainant and not to his sister - Mother of the complainant informed..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d) -- Certified copies - Revenue case - Misfeasance in public office - Compensation - Prolonged harassment and considerable costs in pursuing his request for getting copy - Direction to OP to pay Rs.5,000/ - as compensation for harassment and towards costs of iligation - Direction to initiate appropriate action to..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 17(1)(a)(i) -- Pecuniary jurisdiction - Insurance claim - Claim of the appellant in his complaint was for a sum of Rs. 27 lakh - OP proposed to settle the claim for 4,50,344/ - which the appellant challenged by filing complaint before the State Commission - Order passed by the State Commission at admission stage to transfer the..........

MADHYA PRADESH STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(b) , 2(1)(d) -- Complainant - Consumer - Beneficiary - Vehicle finance - Locus standi - Financier of vehicle - He being beneficiary is competent to file and prosecute a complaint under the provisions of CP Act...........

PUNJAB STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(r) -- Unfair trade practice - Education - BAMS course - The college misrepresented the students with regard to the recognition and affiliation - Due to non - availability of these documents, college unable to conduct examination of BAMS - Definitely amounts to unfair trade practice - Respondents liable to refund the amount..........

MADHYA PRADESH CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BHOPAL

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 157 -- Insurance claim - Transfer of vehicle - Intimation not given to the appellant - insurer - Held that unless the policy is transferred in the name of the purchaser, the latter cannot claim any compensation from the Insurance Company...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Employees' Pension Scheme, 1995 - Pension - Claim rejected on account of ineligibility on ground of crossing the age of 60 years prior to coming into force of scheme - Case of petitioner fully established from declaration form forwarded by employer to respondent No. 1 and thereafter admission of respondent No. 1 himself and..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d), Contract Act, 1872, Section 182 -- Consumer - In terms of agreement, LECA was not an agent of the petitioner for sale, purchase, installations of the equipment manufactured by the petitioner - The installation of equipment in the complainant's premises was undertaken by the LECA as an independent entity - If LECA found any..........

Showing : 1951-1960 of 4815 Results