LawMirror.com

Results of consumer+case+limitation

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 2051-2060 of 4786 Results

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Medical service - Termination of pregnancy - Service rendered by OP No. 1 was gratis and not for payment of fees or promise of deferred payment - Complainants can be said to be having no locus standi to file consumer complaint for the deficiency in service on the part of OP No. 1...........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Medical negligence - Termination of pregnancy - Alleged accidental injury occurred in terms of perforation to uterus while undergoing D&C procedure - OP No. 1 took due and reasonable care and did exhibit professional skill such as Gynaecologist while treating complainant No.1 - In no way it could be held that she was..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),(r),14(h),(b) -- Damages - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - Credit Card - Credit card insurance benefit - Denial of - Accidental insurance benefit provided on credit card - In addition to National Insurance Company there is mention of association of HSBC with TATA AIG Insurance as well - To the consumer card..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Vehicle finance - Forcible possession - If any service provider wants to engage private agency for recovery of dues, it has to authorize it to only recover it through legal method, say by suit for recovery and not through any other methods - Say by employing threats, harassment, force and causing injuries from whom some..........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Vehicle finance - Forcible possession - Conclusion drawn enumerated...........

DELHI STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Vehicle finance - Forcible possession - OP held guilty of grossest kind of deficiency in service and unfair trade practice for breach of contract of hire - purchase/ loan agreement by seizing the vehicle illegally and selling it for throw away price and recovering the dues in respect of goods i.e. vehicle which had ceased..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g),14(1),(hb) -- Insurance claim - Deficiency in service - Damages - OP has admitted glaring deficiency in their services by stating that they are not keeping any record of the incoming letters of faxes etc - Which shows that the claims/cases of the consumers are being taken on record or thrown off the record at the whims and..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Electricity bill -- Electricity theft - Principles of natural justice - Clear from checking report that checking was not done either in the presence of the consumer or responsible official of the consumer - The meter was not tested in the M&T Lab - No notice of testing was given to the consumer - The principles of the natural justice not followed - Complainant has not..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1),(g), Electricity Act, 1910, Section 39,44(c) -- Electricity - Theft of electricity - What the inspecting team saw was a small hole in front of the meter - They have not seen the consumer complainant abstracting/consuming the electricity and using energy dishonestly - Nor did they see any artificial means or unauthorized mean used..........

THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, UNION TERRITORY, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2007
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 3,2(1),(g) -- Additional remedy - Electricity bill - Deficiency in service - Plea that complainant has not exhausted the departmental remedy of presenting the case before the Disputes Settlement Committee and the complainant is guilty of theft of energy hence the District Forum had no jurisdiction to hear the complaint repelled - The..........

Showing : 2051-2060 of 4786 Results