Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 13 -- Ex parte order - Amendment of complaint - Counsel put appearance on behalf of the petitioners but failed to file written statement or represent the authority in subsequent hearing and was proceeded ex parte - Complainant had filed an amended complaint and had altered its prayer clause substantially, it would have been..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Plot allotment - Semi - built house - Excepting payment of Rs. 40,000/ - and carrying on correspondent respondent not making any payment either of the plot allotted or the semi built house for 14 years - He did not comply with the schedule of payment which stipulated that an allottee was to pay six..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 12, 13 -- Ex parte order - Amendment of complaint - Counsel put appearance on behalf of the petitioners but failed to file written statement or represent the authority in subsequent hearing and was proceeded ex parte - Complainant had filed an amended complaint and had altered its prayer clause substantially, it would have been..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Housing - Plot allotment - Semi-built house - Excepting payment of Rs.40,000/- and carrying on correspondent respondent not making any payment either of the plot allotted or the semi built house for 14 years - He did not comply with the schedule of payment which stipulated that an allottee was to pay six quarterly..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Insurance claim - Repudiation - Non disclosure about previous policies - Policies were issued within 2 years period before the death of the life assured - There are no allegations of pre - existing ailment or any complaints about health of the life assured or..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Education - Coaching Institute - Appellant carrying on coaching Institute at Chandigarh - They are also residing there and there is no branch office within the jurisdiction of the District Forum Hamirpur - Even no cause of action wholly or in part has arisen with the jurisdiction of the Forum below..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Cause of action had arisen to the complainant - respondent in the middle of October, 2004 and complaint filed on 18.12.2007 - Complaint held to be time barred...........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d) -- Medical negligence - Compensation - Wrong diagnosis - Patient a small boy aged 8 years at time of treatment - Ailment wrongly diagnosed as measles and instead of disease of Stevens-Johnson's Syndrome (SJS) and treatment of measles given and not for the disease of SJS - For not giving treatment for disease of SJS..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Medi - claim policy - Pre - existing disease - Suppression of material fact - There is a gap of 35 days in issuance of policy for the fourth year, which have been treated fresh policy for the risk period 6.8.1997 to 5.8.1998 - As per record, Coronary artery..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 14(1)(d), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Housing - Flat allotment - Non handing of possession - Compensation - Punitive costs - In one complaint purchaser of flat has paid the entire consideration and in other substantial amount paid and willing to pay the balance amount - Builder cannot deprive them..........
