Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)((g), 2(1)(r) -- Complaint maintainability - Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - The case of the complainant is based on deficiency of service and unfair practice on the part of the OPs in executing the work based on P1 and P3 agreements - Mere fact that there..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C - 1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r) -- Complaint maintainability - Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - The case of the complainant is based on deficiency of service and unfair practice on the part of the OPs in executing the work based on P1 and P3 agreements - Mere fact that there..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r), 13, 14(1)(d) -- Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Expert report - Compensation - The expert engineer appointed by the State Commission submitted expert report C1 which showed the OPs failed to complete the construction of the commercial building as agreed by them - The Expert..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Availing of services of OP No.1 and 2 for the purpose of constructing a commercial building - The complainant has not been earning or deriving any profit - There was no nexus between the services availed and the process of profit making - Held that the complainant has not availed the services..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Availing of services of OP No.1 and 2 for the purpose of constructing a commercial building - The complainant has not been earning or deriving any profit - There was no nexus between the services availed and the process of profit making - Held that the complainant has not availed the services..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(e), 2(1)(g), 2(1)(r) -- Complaint maintainability - Housing construction - Commercial building - Deficiency in service - Unfair trade practice - The case of the complainant is based on deficiency of service and unfair practice on the part of the OPs in executing the work based on P1 and P3 agreements - Mere fact that there..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - New plea - Postal service - Deficiency in service - The point that Fora below have erred in directing the petitioner to pay the draft amount of Rs.20,000/-as well not canvassed before the State Commission in appeal and raised first time in Revision Petition - Petitioner cannot be permitted to raise..........
Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - New plea - Postal service - Deficiency in service - The point that Fora below have erred in directing the petitioner to pay the draft amount of Rs.20,000/-as well not canvassed before the State Commission in appeal and raised first time in Revision Petition - Petitioner cannot be permitted to raise..........
