LawMirror.com

Results of consumer+service

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 671-680 of 4856 Results

HARYANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHANDIGARH

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(oo), 14(1) (d) -- Pesticides- Spurious pesticides- Complainant did not spray the medicine at appropriate time in his paddy crop as recommended by the OP- Rather used it when the crop was ready for harvesting and for that reason the use of pesticides by the complainant for his paddy crop was of no use - Appeal accepted and impugned..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Insurance Act, 1938, Section 45, Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 13(4) -- Insurance claim - Repudiation - Suppression of material fact - Adverse inference - Ailment of gall bladder and CRD stones which has no nexus with death of insured due to breast cancer - Specific averment by complainant that ailment disclosed to the agent by the policy holder but agent..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1) -- Limitation - Cause of action arose to the complainant - appellant in the month of August, 2004 and complaint instituted on 15.12.2007 before the District Forum - The same rightly held to be barred by limitation by the District Forum - The appellant has not been able to bring any evidence on record to prove that there is..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 12 -- Deficiency in service - Service matter dispute - Issues relating to deficiency regarding retiral benefits, provident fund and tardy investigation and wrongful exercise of powers - These issues are not within purview of the Fora under the CP Act since in all these cases, appropriate forum for the appellant was to..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Raitha Sanjeevini Accidental Insurance Scheme - Insurance claim - Respondent's son, as is expected and a normal routine for any farmer, who has worked in the fields, the deceased went to take a bath on completion of agricultural activities and unfortunately drowned in lake - The Fora below were right in concluding that this..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Raitha Sanjeevini Accidental Insurance Scheme - Insurance claim - Respondent's son, as is expected and a normal routine for any farmer, who has worked in the fields, the deceased went to take a bath on completion of agricultural activities and unfortunately drowned in lake - The Fora below were right in concluding that this..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Banking service - Loan recovery - Availment of loan not denied by the complainant - The default in repayment is also not denied - Neither the legal notice issued on behalf of the Bank nor non - acceptance of the complainant's request to suspend the recovery against the balance of loan amount can be considered a deficiency..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Banking service - Loan recovery - Availment of loan not denied by the complainant - The default in repayment is also not denied - Neither the legal notice issued on behalf of the Bank nor non-acceptance of the complainant's request to suspend the recovery against the balance of loan amount can be considered a deficiency in..........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) -- Raitha Sanjeevini Rules, 1996 - Raitha Sanjeevini Accidental Insurance Scheme - Insurance claim -Respondent's son, as is expected and a normal routine for any farmer, who has worked in the fields, the deceased went to take a bath on completion of agricultural activities and unfortunately drowned in lake - The Fora below..........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2011
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), 21(b) -- Revisional jurisdiction - Concurrent findings - Housing - Residential premises - Allotment of - Seeking of additional space of 100 sq. ft. - There is overwhelming documentary evidence on record which goes against the petitioner - complainant - There is no reason to disbelieve these documents - Since two Foras below..........

Showing : 671-680 of 4856 Results