LawMirror.com

Results of consumer

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 1731-1740 of 4728 Results

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g) , 14(1)(d) -- Deficiency in service - Compensation - Loss of business - Consumer Fora as per law is not a Fora to grant this relief...........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Cause of action - Insurance claim - Unless the claim was repudiated it cannot be said that the cause of action to maintain the complaint finally arose in favour of the respondent - Plea of the appellant - OP that complaint is time barred repelled...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(o) -- Service - Provident Fund - Held that a provident fund subscriber is a consumer of the services provided by the employer...........

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, NEW DELHI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(o) -- EPF Act, Section 10 - On dismissal of respondent for causing loss to Bank his provident fund contribution forfeited by employer Bank - The amount of loss caused by respondent is still continued to be shown as outstanding and has not been declared as non performing asset - Finding of the Fora below directing the petitioner..........

MAHARASHTRA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, MUMBAI

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(d) -- Consumer - Commercial purpose - Insurance claim - Plea that complainant company is in the business of exporting items which is commercial purpose - Held that policy is for indemnification and actual loss - It is not intended to generate profit - Consumer complaint for deficiency on the part of Insurance Company can lie in..........

ORISSA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CUTTACK

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 24A -- Limitation - Appellant cancelled the plot issuing letter dated 16.4.2002 - The cause of action arose to file complaint arose on that date - Complaint filed in the year 2006 held to be barred by time and liable to be dismissed...........

NATIONAL DELHI CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act,1986, -- Ss.2(1)(g) & 14(1)(d) - Housing - Delayed possession - Compensation - Builder agreeing to deliver possession within stipulated time - Contention that as the price of the flat/property has gone up, it should not be directed to pay any compensation or to pay compensation at reduced rate for delay in delivering possession of the property..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(g), Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, Section 2(19) , 8 -- Insurance claim - Driving licence - Learner's licence - Non standard claim - Respondent - owner cum driver was only having learner's licence when he was driving the maxi - cab and carrying 4 passengers when accident occurred - Violation of terms of breach of policy - Respondent..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 2(1)(f) -- Motor car - Manufacturing defect - Punitive costs - From day one knocking problem which could not be rectified - Held to be a major defect particularly in hilly areas when the engine does not get proper power due to defect therein - Held that the vehicle sold to the respondent was suffering from manufacturing defect -..........

H.P. STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, SHIMLA

Year of decision: 2008
Details

Consumer Protection Act, 1986, Section 11(2) -- Territorial jurisdiction - Plea that car was sold at Chandigarh and dealer as well as manufacturer do not have their either registered office or branch office within the territorial jurisdiction of the District Forum Shimla as no part of cause of action arose in favour the respondent to maintain the complaint at Shimla..........

Showing : 1731-1740 of 4728 Results