LawMirror.com

Results of civil procedure code+injunction+order+39

Andriod Application iphone Application

Showing : 671-680 of 29458 Results

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Local Commissioner - Any report regarding existing construction, assessment of loss to plaintiffs, estimated costs, estimated time and whether property is fit for habitation or not, would amount to collection of evidence in favour of a party, which would be injustice to other party...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Appointment of Local Commissioner - No right vested in favour of a party to get commission issued and rather same is an enabling provision that enables Court to appoint a Commissioner if it is of opinion that same is required in a case...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Section 115, Order 26, Rule 9 -- Revision - Order dismissing application U.O.26.R.9 CPC - Revision against an order dismissing application for appointment of Local Commissioner is not maintainable...........

HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, Section 133 -- Proceedings u/s 133 Cr.P.C. - Tehsildar specifically mentioned in his report that drain was constructed for discharging water of house of complainant and one `K' - Respondent constructed the house which caused blockage of drain - Complainant admitted that he had not specified khasra number of drain - No demarcation was obtained..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7 -- Appointment of commissioner - It is discretionary power of Court and a party cannot claim appointment as a matter of right - If Court is of opinion that report of Commissioner can help it in arriving at a proper and just decision, it can issue commission - But such exercise of discretion cannot be normally interfered with by..........

RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 39, Rule 7 -- Appointment of commissioner - Merely on the basis of assertions made by petitioner in his application filed U.O.39.R.7 CPC, wherein he has claimed to have possession over subject land, trial Court cannot appoint a Commissioner so as to serve his cause...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Recall of a witness - Right to put questions to witness recalled U.O.18.R.17 CPC is given only to Court and even cross-examination is not ordinarily permitted on the answers given to such questions, without leave of Court...........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 18, Rule 17 -- Recall of a witness - Witness cannot be recalled at the instance of a party for the purpose of examining, cross-examining or re-examining - Power to recall and re-examine a witness is exclusively that of Court trying the suit...........

PUNJAB AND HARAYANA HIGH COURT

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 17 -- Amendment of plaint - Suit for declaration of ownership - Amendment sought to incorporate alternative relief of possession - Plaintiff was never in possession of suit property as per findings of trial Court - He had claimed ownership on basis of sale deed executed by one `S' - However, ownership of said `S' over suit property..........

SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Year of decision: 2025
Details

Civil Procedure Code, 1908, Order 6, Rule 1, 2 -- Pleadings - Fraud - When fraud is alleged, plaintiff must set forth particulars of fraud which he alleges...........

Showing : 671-680 of 29458 Results